解释学与阅读

Hermeneutics and Reading

解释学作为一种批评话语一直强调其语言学范式。虽然解释学似乎已经是一种学科间的桥梁,但大多数当代批评话语一直对把解释学传统作为一个普遍的文化批评的方法保持警惕性的冷漠。这表明解释学的未来将依赖能够找到把一个遭到抑制但仍然活跃的主体恢复到解释学过程中的方式。与解释学发展历史紧密相关的文学批评——解释学批评、接受理论和文化理论——经历了"奴隶式的阅读"、"主人式阅读"和新近倡导的"亲近式阅读"。当前的文学批评只有在把文学作为传播交流方式的前提下恢复文本/读者范式中被抹杀的作者的维度,才能真正将一个遭到抑制但仍然活跃的主体恢复到文学解释学的过程中来。

As a critical discourse, hermeneutics has involved a linguistic paradigm. Despite its broadly interdisciplinary implications, most contemporary critical discourse has kept a wary distance from the hermeneutic tradition as a general approach to cultural critique. This suggests that the future of hermeneutics will depend upon finding ways of restoring a chastened but still active subject to the process of interpretation. With the development of hermeneutics, literary criticism： hermeneutical criticism, reception theory and cultural theory, has known slave model of reading, master model of reading and closeness model of reading. Only by restoring the dimension of author to the text/reader paradigm of reading on the basis of literature as communication can the current literary criticism restore a chastened but still active subject to the process of literary interpretation.