期刊文献+

私营企业的企业家背景、多元化战略与企业业绩 被引量:68

Entrepreneur Backgrounds,Diversification,and Firm Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文运用"高阶理论"考察了私营企业的企业家背景、多元化战略选择以及企业业绩之间的关系。研究发现,与低学历的、年长的、创业前没有"企业负责人"经历的企业家相比,高学历的、年轻的以及创业之前曾担任过"企业负责人"的企业家更倾向于选择多元化战略。研究也发现,高学历、低年龄、"企业负责人"经历与高的销售额、资产额、资产增长率和净资产增长率正相关;多元化战略能够带来更大的资产规模、更高的资产增长率和净资产增长率,但对利润率没有显著的影响。同时,企业家的背景与多元化战略的交互作用同样影响着企业的业绩。创业前有过"企业负责人"经历的企业家采用多元化战略可以带来更好的业绩,而没有这种经历的企业家则会收到负面的效果。有意思的是,高学历和低学历的企业家采用多元化战略都提高了企业的销售额、资产额和净资产增长率,而中等学历的企业家采取多元化战略则带来了相反的效果。本文最后对该现象的可能原因进行了探讨。 This article examines the relationship between entrepre- neur backgrounds, the choice of diversification strategy, and firm performance from upper echelons perspective. Using a large survey on Chinese private firms, we find that entrepreneurs who are young, have higher educational achievement, and have prior management experiences are more likely to pursue diversification strategy compared to those entrepreneurs who are old, have lower educational achievement, and without prior management experiences. We also find the impact of entrepreneur background upon firm performance: entrepreneurs who are young, have higher educational achievement, and have prior management experiences contribute positively to the sales, asset scale, asset growth and equity growth of their firms. Evidence shows that diversification contributed to greater asset scale and growth, but not necessarily to higher profit rate. Meanwhile, the interaction between entrepreneur background and diversification has a significant impact upon firm performance. Prior management experience is an important mediator. Entrepreneurs with prior management experiences promote sales, asset scale, asset growth, equity growth and gross margin through diversification compared to those entrepreneurs without such experiences. Interestingly, when education serves as a mediator, curvilinear relationship exists between diversification and firm performance. Entrepreneurs with either high educational achievement or low educational achievement increase sales, asset scale and equity growth when diversification is adopted, while entrepreneurs with middle-level of educational achievement tends to cause negative effect on firm performance when diversification is adopted. The paper then discusses the possible reasons bchind these findings. We argue that the choice of diversification is determined by the relative weight of strategic preference and resource constraints. The positive influence of higher educational achievement and prior management experience upon the choice of diversification points to the importance of resource acquisition. The paper also gives suggestions to practitioners based on our research findings.
出处 《南开管理评论》 CSSCI 2007年第5期12-25,共14页 Nankai Business Review
关键词 企业家背景 多元化 企业业绩 高阶理论 Entrepreneur Background Diversification Firm Performance Upper Echelons Perspective
  • 相关文献

参考文献51

  • 1朱武祥.金融系统资源配置功能的有效性与企业多元化——兼论企业集团多元化策略[J].管理世界,2001,17(4):137-144. 被引量:23
  • 2Caves, R. E.. Diversification and Seller Concentration: Evidence from Change. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1981, (63): 289-293.
  • 3Palich, L. E., Cardinal, L. B., Miller. C .C.. Curvilinearity in the Diversification-performance Linkage: An Examination of over Three Decades of Research. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, (21): 155-174.
  • 4Lang, L., Poulsen, A., Stulz, R.. Asset Sales, Firm Performance, and the Agency Costs of Managerial Discretion. Journal of Financial Economics, 1995, (37): 3-37.
  • 5Berger, P. G., Ofek, E.. Diversification' s Effect on Firm Value. Journal of Financial Economics, 1995, 37(1): 39-65.
  • 6Jensen, M. C.. The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. The Journal of Finance, 1993, (48): 831-880.
  • 7Ramanujam, V., Varadarajan, P.. Research on Corporate Diversification: A Synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 1989, 10(6): 523-551.
  • 8Servaes, H.. The Value of Diversification during the Conglomerate Merger Wave. Journal of Finance, 1996, (51): 1201-1225.
  • 9Graham, J. R., Lemmon, M. L., Wolf, J. G.. Does Corporate Diversification Destroy Value? The Journal of Finance, 2002, (57): 695-720.
  • 10Duboksfy, P., Varadarajan, P.. Diversification and Measures of Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 1987, (30): 579-608.

二级参考文献28

  • 1迈克尔·波特.竞争优势(中译本)第一版[M].华夏出版社,1997.329.
  • 2汤姆·彼得斯 沃特曼.追求卓越[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2002..
  • 3普拉哈拉德 哈麦尔.竞争未来.哈佛商业评论,1994,.
  • 4斯塔凡·布鲁思·莫斯·沃伦.诺基亚传奇—从芬兰到世界[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2001..
  • 5Goold, M and K Luchs. Why Diversify ? Four Decades of Management Thinking[J]. Academy of Management Executive, 7, 1993.
  • 6Useem, M. Executive Defense: Shareholder Power and Corporate Reorganization [M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
  • 7Cassano, J. The Link Between Corporate Strategy, Organization, and Performance Chap. 7 in Babian, H and H Glass. eds. [A]. Handbook of l3usiness Strategy: 1987/1988 Yearbook [C]. Boston: Warren, Gotham, and Lamont. 1987.
  • 8UNCTAD. Erasmus University database.
  • 9Ramanujam, V & P Varadarajan. Research on Corporate Diversification : A Hypothesis [J]. Strategic Management Journal, (10/6), 1989.
  • 10M. Gort(1962),Diversification and Integration in American Industry,Princeton University Press.

共引文献288

同被引文献1511

引证文献68

二级引证文献1070

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部