发现于新疆策勒县的四件唐代汉文文书残页考释

A Textual Research on Four Fragments of the Documents of the Tang Dynasty Discovered in Cele County of Xinjiang

本文刊布和考释了2006年由民间找宝者发现于策勒县达玛沟乡北沙漠废墟的四件汉文文书残页(其中一件背面有于阗文),论证了文书中的"蔺城镇"可能即《新唐书》中的"兰城镇",《新唐书.地理志》所载"兰城镇"或"兰城守捉",应是"蔺城镇"或"蔺城守捉"之误。考释了《唐某年于阗供酒帐》,指出账页上的"硕"即容量单位"石"。C6号文书残页首次透露了中土诸子百家的经典曾通行于古于阗,但残存文字出自何书,或者系失传古籍佚文,尚需研究。

This article publishes and studies the four fragments of the documents of the Tang Dynasty (one piece has writings in Khotan script on the back) found by a treasure seeker in 2006 in the ruin to the north of Domoko Township, Cele County. The author argues that 'Lincheng Township' mentioned in these fragments might be 'Lancheng Township' recorded in Xin Tang Shu (New History of the Tang Dynasty), 'Lancheng Township' and 'Lancheng Shouzhuo' (Lancheng Defence Detachment) is actually misspelling of 'Lincheng Township' and 'Lancheng Shouzhuo'. The author also makes a textual research on Tang Mou Nian Yu Tian Gong Jiu Zhang (The Wine Supply Account of Khotan in X Year of the Tang Dynasty) and points out that 'Shuo' in the account is 'Dan' (a unit of capacity). Fragment C6 reveals the popularity of the classics of hundred schools of thought from inland China in ancient Khotan, but from which book these remaining characters are and whether they are remnants of lost ancient books still need further study.