期刊文献+

新型有益菌纤维素敷料抑菌作用的实验研究 被引量:2

Experimental Study in Antibacterial Effect of Neotype Beneficial Bacteria Cellulose Dressing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过对三种创面敷料在体抑菌作用的比较,为临床针对外科创面选择并应用合适创面敷料提供理论依据。方法选用新型有益菌纤维素敷料、凡士林纱布和浸有新霉素黄连素溶液的敷料三种敷料,分别对金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌进行在体创面抑菌实验的比较。结果新型有益菌纤维素敷料具有较好的广谱抑菌作用。结论新型有益菌纤维素敷料是目前临床上较为理想的创面敷料。 Objective To compare the antibacterial effect of four different wound dressings. Method Bacteriostatic effects of the neotype beneficial bacteria cellulose wound dressing, petrolatum gauge, and wound dressing containing neomycin and berberine were tested on Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Result Broad-spectrum antibacterial effect of the beneficial bacteria cellulose dressing is better than that of other dressings. Conclusion Beneficial bacteria cellulose dressing is better wound dressing in clinical application.
出处 《热带医学杂志》 CAS 2007年第10期965-967,共3页 Journal of Tropical Medicine
关键词 敷料 细菌 创面 wound dressing beneficial bacteria wound
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献38

  • 1方之扬 吴中立.烧伤理论与实践[M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1989.476.
  • 2Thomson PD,Taddonio TE,Tait MJ,et al.Susceptibility of pseudomonas and staphylococcus wound isolates to topical antimicrobial agents:a 10-year review and clinical evaluation [J].Burns,1989,15(3):1990.
  • 3Lawrence LC.Burn bacteriology during the last 50 years [J].Burns,1992,18(suppl):S23.
  • 4Tanner J,Vallitte P K,Soderling E.Biomaterials,2001,22(12):1613~1618.
  • 5Thomson R C,Yaszemski,Powers J M,et al.Biomaterials,1998,19(21):1935~1943.
  • 6Hasegawa M,Sudo A,Shikinami Y,et al.Biomaterials,1999,20(20):1969~1975.
  • 7Li Y,Ma T,Yang S T,et al.Biomaterials,2001,22:609~618.
  • 8Marois Y,Chakfé N,Deng X,et al.Biomaterials,1995,16(15):1131~1139.
  • 9Carcía paez J M,Carrera San Martin A,García Sestafe J V,et al.Biomaterials,1994,15(12):981~984.
  • 10Zhang Z,King M W,Marois Y,et al.Biomaterials,1994,15(13):1099~1100.

共引文献6

同被引文献11

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部