摘要
对124名大学本科生进行了问卷调查,结果表明:(1)总的来说,大学生的自我价值感更多地权变于道德原则,在应对方式的使用频度上依次是解决问题、求助、幻想、合理化、退避、自责。在人际接纳权变性以及解决问题和退避应对方式上存在显著的性别差异;(2)在控制了自我价值感的情况下,多元线性回归分析表明,人际接纳权变性能够负向预测解决问题,正向预测求助、自责、退避、幻想;而个人目标权变性能负向预测解决问题、求助,正向预测自责;道德原则权变性正向预测解决问题。
Questionnaire investigation was conducted with 124 college students. The results indicated as follows: (1) generally, self-worth of college students was mostly contingent on their moral principle, the order by frequency of the coping style they used was problem-solving, help-seeking, fantasy, rationalization, avoidance, self-accusation. There was significant gender difference on interpersonal acceptance contingency of self-worth, problem-solving or avoidance coping style; (2) multiple linear regression analysis by entering all predictors and controlling for self-worth indicated that interpersonal acceptance contingency negatively predicted problem-solving and positively predicted help-seeking, self- accusation, avoidance, fantasy, whereas personal goals contingency negatively predicted problem-solving, help-seeking and positively predicted self-accusation, moral principle contingency predicted problem-solving positively.
出处
《心理发展与教育》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第4期50-56,共7页
Psychological Development and Education