摘要
马克思把俄国"农村公社"这一独特的土地所有制结构作为其设想的起点,得出俄国在一定的历史条件下,有可能跨越资本主义"卡夫丁峡谷"而直接进入社会主义的结论。恩格斯把这一设想扩大到其他类似的国家。列宁根据新的时代特征,提出了一国胜利论,从不同的角度得出了与马克思相同的结论,并得到了实践的检验。在一国胜利论指导下的中、俄等国通过第二种途径进入社会主义已经成为现实,这虽然避免了资本主义发展带来的极端不幸,但先天不足的弊端又给我们出了一道历史性难题:如何建设现实社会主义?实践已反复证明,中国特色社会主义理论就是给这道历史难题下的最好注脚。
Russian village community which is a unique system of land ownership structure is as a token as an imaginable beginning by Marx. Basing on this staring point, he obtained the following conclusion. Under a certain historical condition, Russia has the possibility to span the Crafting Gorge of capitalism and directly enters to the socialism. Engels expanded this tentative plan to other similar countries. According to the new times feature, Lenin had obtained the same theory with Marx from the different angle, which has passed the examination of practice. Through the proof of repeated practice, the Chinese characteristic socialism theory is the solution.
出处
《山西财经大学学报》
CSSCI
2007年第10期9-13,共5页
Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
关键词
跨越理论
一国胜利论
中国特色社会主义理论
现实社会主义
Span theory
The Theory of One Country Victory
The Chinese Characteristic Socialism theory
The Realistic Socialism