期刊文献+

在历史与诗学之间——罗兰·巴尔特的神话美学 被引量:2

BETWEEN HISTORY AND POETICS——Mythology of Roland Barthes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在中国学界,罗兰.巴尔特常被看作大力提倡文本内部自涉性和零度写作的结构-后结构主义理论家。事实上,巴尔特一直有另一面,即以知识分子的批判立场来参与历史和文本建构。他的神话符号学融合意识形态批评和形式主义批评,揭示出在相似的语词结构之下所隐含的时代内涵,从而既有别于左派立场又不同于纯粹语言学。考察巴尔特的神话符号学,有助于我们全面理解他的复杂性,从"现代神话"的角度来观察大众文化现象。 Chinese scholars have usually regarded Roland Barthes as a structuralist or post-structuralist who greatly called for self-reference of inner-text. In the fact, Roland Barthes was always participating in the construction of text from the point of intellectual's criticism. His myth semiology tied to make ideological criticism and formalist criticism through opening out the connotative meanings from the same frameworks of language, which made him different from the Left and single linguistics. Therefore, reviewing Barthes' mythology is helpful to understand his complexity and look into the mass-cultural phenomena from the point of "Modern Myth".
作者 陈倩
机构地区 北京大学中文系
出处 《西华师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2007年第5期16-19,共4页 Journal of China West Normal University:Philosophy & Social Sciences
关键词 罗兰·巴尔特 神话符号学 历史 诗学 Roland Barthes myth semiology history poetics
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[3]Steven Ungar,Betty R McGraw.Signs in Culture:Roland Barthes Today[C].Iowa City:University of Iowa Press,1989.58-59.
  • 2[4]汪民安.罗兰·巴尔特.[M].长沙:湖南教育出版社,1999.83.
  • 3[5]D A Miller.Bringing out Roland Barthes[M].Berkeley & Los Angeles & Oxford:University of California Press,1992.36.
  • 4[6](法)罗兰·巴尔特.神话--大众文化诠释[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1999.185.
  • 5[7]罗兰·巴尔特.文之悦[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2002.
  • 6[8]D S Clarke Jr.Principle of the Semiotic[M].New York:Routledge and Kegan Paul,1987.30.
  • 7[13](法)罗兰·巴特.S/Z[M].屠友祥译.上海:上海人民出版社,2000.
  • 8[10]Patrizia Lombardo.The Three Paradoxes of Roland Barthes[M],Athens and London:The University of Georgia Press,1989.
  • 9[12]Andrew Brown.Roland Barthes:The Figure of Writing[M],Oxford:Clarendon Press,1992,18.

共引文献1

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部