期刊文献+

语篇中指称选择的认知语用解释

COGNITIVE AND PRAGMATIC EXPLANATION OF REFERENTIAL CHOICE IN DISCOURSE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 叙述语篇中的指称选择主要受到三个因素的影响:指称距离,指称对象是否引起歧义,指称对象与话题焦点的关系。这三个因素归根结底可以从心理学方面得到解释。人类的记忆系统和认知特点决定了人类对指称选择的认知加工方式。 Referential choice in narrative discourse is mainly affected by three factors: referential distance, ambiguity of referential expressions, and the relationship between referents and focus of a topic. An ultimate explanation of these factors can be found from the psychological point of view. It is the human memory system and cognitive characteristics that altogether determine the cognitive ways of the processing of referential choice.
作者 杨剑英
出处 《西华师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2007年第5期94-97,共4页 Journal of China West Normal University:Philosophy & Social Sciences
基金 西华师范大学科研启动基金资助项目(2003)
关键词 指称选择 指称距离 歧义 话题焦点 referential choice referential distance ambiguity focus of a topic
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1李晓庆,杨玉芳.语篇中指代词的分布规律与心理机制[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(1):1-9. 被引量:5
  • 2许余龙.英汉指称词语表达的可及性[J].外语教学与研究,2000,32(5):321-328. 被引量:173
  • 3[4]Ariel,Mira.Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents[M].London:Routledge.1990.
  • 4[5]Baddeley,A.Working Memory[A].In Sternberg,R.J.& Wagner R.K.(ed.).Readings in Cognitive Psychology[C].Fort Worth:Harwurt Brace College Publishers.1999.139-149.
  • 5[6]Brizuela,Maquela.The Selection of Definite Expressions in Spanish[A].In Karen van Hoek,et al (ed.).Discourse Studies in Cognitive Linguistics[C].Amsterdam:John Benjamins.1997.
  • 6[7]Brown,Gillian.& Yule,George.Discourse Analysis[M].Cambridge:CUP.1983/2000.
  • 7[8]Emmott,Catherine.Embodied in a Constructed World:Narrative Processing,Knowledge Representation,and Anaphor[A].In Karen van Hoek,et al (ed.).Discourse Studies in Cognitive Linguistics[C].Amsterdam:John Benjamins.1997.
  • 8[9]Epstein,Richard.Roles,Frames and Definiteness[A].In Karen van Hoek,et al (ed.).Discourse Studies in Cognitive Linguistics[C].Amsterdam:John Benjamins.1997.
  • 9[10]Fox,Barbara A.Anaphora in Popular Written English Narratives[A].In Russel Tomlin (ed.).Coherence and Grounding in Discourse[C].Amsterdam & Philadelphia:John Benjamins.1987a.
  • 10[11]Fox,Barbara A.Discourse Structure and Anaphora:Written and Conversational English[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.1987b.

二级参考文献20

  • 1缪小春.影响代词加工的语义和语法因素研究[J].心理学报,1996,28(4):352-358. 被引量:15
  • 2许余龙.汉英篇章中句子主题的识别[J].外国语,1996,19(6):3-9. 被引量:32
  • 3[1]Gordon C, Grosz J, Gilliom A. Pronouns, names, and centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive science, 1993, 17:311~347
  • 4[2]Gordon C, Chan D. Pronouns, passives, and discourse cohesion. Journal of Memory and Language, 1995, 34: 216~231
  • 5[3]Cahn J. The effect of pitch accenting on pronoun referent resolution. In Proc of the Association for Computational Linguistics(ACL), Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1995. 190~193
  • 6[4]Kameyama M. Stressed and unstressed pronouns: complementary preferences. In: peter Bosch, Rob van der Sandt ed. Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives, Cambridge University, 1999. 306~321
  • 7[5]Dahan D et al. Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 2002, 47: 292~314
  • 8[6]Tanenhaus M K, Magnuson J S, Dahan D, Chambers C G. Eye movements and lexical access in spoken language comprehension: evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistics processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2000, 29: 557~580
  • 9[7]Arnold J. et al. The rapid use of gender information: Evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking. Cognition, 2000, 76: 13~26
  • 10[8]Strube M. et al. Functional centering. Pro. of the 34th Annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Santa Cruz, Ca, 1996, Jun (23-28): 270~277

共引文献174

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部