期刊文献+

自酸蚀粘接剂复合树脂修复后牙Ⅰ类洞三年的临床评价 被引量:5

Three years clinical evaluation of self-eching primer and composite resin on posterior ClassⅠ restorations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价自酸蚀粘接剂复合树脂修复后牙Ⅰ类洞的临床效果。方法70例中深龋磨牙分为两组,实验组36例采用自酸蚀粘接剂+混合填料复合树脂修复,对照组34例使用全酸蚀牙本质粘接剂+可充压复合树脂修复。结果在复查的三年期限内,两组修复体在术后敏感性、修复体表面形态、边缘密合性及继发龋方面均无显著性差异,色彩匹配性在术后一年和二年的统计学结果有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论用自酸蚀粘接剂和复合树脂修复后牙Ⅰ类洞可获得同样满意的临床效果,但混合填料复合树脂组色彩稳定性较可充压复合树脂组略差。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of self-eching primer and composite resin on posterior ClassⅠrestorations.Methods Seventy molars with medium to deep caries from 23 patients (6 males, 17 females) were divided into two groups. The experimental group: 36 cases were restored with Clearifil SE bond (self etching bond) + Clearfil AP-X (hybrid composite); The control group: 34 cases were restored with Prime & Bond NT(total etching dentin adhesive) + Esthet-X(packable composite). The restorations were assessed after placement at 1 week, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years to check post-operative sensitivity, color match, anatomic form, marginal adaptation and secondary caries according to Rege's criteria.Results Post-operative sensitivity of molars was not present in the experimental group, only 1 case had temporary sensitivity after 1 week in the control group. There was no significant difference between two groups on sensitivity (P〉0.05). Color match of restorations in both groups had Bravo grade appeared at different stages, no case was scored as Charlie. Eighteen restorations were scored as Bravo in the experimental group and 6 in the control group during 3 years. The results of color match of 1 year and 2 years between the experimental group and the control group had statistically significant differentes (P〈0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at anatomic form, marginal adaptation and secondary caries (P〉0.05), all of them were considered well.Conclusion This study showed that using two different types of adhesive and different composite resin on posterior classⅠ restorations could get satisfied clinical results, the color stability of packable composite resin was better than hybrid composite resin.
出处 《现代口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第4期357-359,共3页 Journal of Modern Stomatology
关键词 自酸蚀粘接剂 全酸蚀牙本质粘接剂 混合填料复合树脂 可充压复合树脂 Self-etching primer Total etching dentin adhesive Hybrid composite resin Packable composite resin
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Perdigao J,Carmo ARP,Geraldeli S,et al.Six-month clinical evaluation of two dentin adhesives applied on dry vs moist Dentin.Journal of Adhesive Dentistry,2001,3:343-352.
  • 2Latta MA,Pitruzzello RM,Kelsey MN,et al.Laboratory evaluatoin of the KBN adhesive system.J Dent Res,1999,78:392.
  • 3Gordan VV,Mjor IA.Short and long-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity of a new resin-based restorative material and self-etching primer.Operative Dentistry,2002,27:543-548.
  • 4Leinfelder KF,Bagne SC,Swift EJ Jr.Packable composites:Overview and technical considerations.J Esthet Dent,1999,11:234-249.
  • 5Loguercio AD,Reis JROBA,et al.In vitro microleackage of packable composites in Class II restorations.Quintessence Int,2004,35:29-33.
  • 6Chen HY,Manhart J,Hickel R,et al.Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured packable composite resins.Dent Marter,2001,17:253-259.
  • 7Ryge G,Snyder M.Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations.J Am Dent Assoc,1973,87:369-377.
  • 8姬爱平,王嘉德.应用牙本质粘合剂和复合树脂修复楔状缺损的临床评价[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1996,31(4):210-213. 被引量:93
  • 9American Dental Association.Statement on posterior resin-based composites.J Am Dent Assoc,1998,129:1627-1628.
  • 10Kiremitci A,Yal cin F,Gokalp S.Bonding to enamel and dentin using self-etching adhesive systems.Quintessence Int,2004,35:367-370.

二级参考文献11

  • 1[1]Wendt SL, Leinfelder KF Clincal evaluation of Clearfil photo posterior:3 - year results. American Journal of Dentistry, 1992,5:121 - 25.
  • 2[2]Jorge Perdigao, Andre R. P. Carmo, Saulo Geraldeli, et al. Six month clinical evaluation of two dentin adhesives applied on dry vs moist Dentin. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry,2001,3:343 - 52.
  • 3[3]Latta MA, et al. Laboratory evaluatoin of the KBN adhesive system. J Dent Res 1999,78:392.
  • 4[4]VV Gordan, IA Mjor. Short - and long - term clinical evaluation of post- operative sensitivity of a new resin - based restorative material and self - etching primer. Operative Dentistry, 2002,27:543 - 48.
  • 5[5]Ryge G Clinical criteria international. Dental Journal 1980,30:347 - 58.
  • 6[6]Hume WK, Gerzina TM Bioavailability of components of resin based materials which are applied to teeth. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine 1996,7:172 - 79.
  • 7[7]M. Unemori, Y. Matsuya, A. Akashi, et al. Composite resin restoration and postoperative sensitivity; Clinical follow - up an undergraduate program. Journal of Dentistry 2001,29:7- 13.
  • 8[8]Akimoto DJ, Momoiy, Kohno A Biocompatibility of Clearfil Liner Bond2 and Clearfil AP - X system on nonexposed and exposed primate teeth. Quintessence International 1998,29:177 - 88.
  • 9[9]Macko DJ, Rutberg M Langeland K Pulpal response to the application of phosphoric acid to dentine. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 1978,45: 930 - 46.
  • 10[10]M Ferrari, FR Tay Technique sensitivity in bonding to vital acidetched dention. Operative Dentistry,2003,28:3- 8.

共引文献98

同被引文献19

  • 1秦满,夏斌,刘宏胜.流动性充填材料用于预防性树脂充填的实验研究[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2005,19(3):302-305. 被引量:53
  • 2徐美玉.Dyract flow流动复合体与光固化窝沟封闭剂治疗磨牙窝沟龋的临床比较[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2006,22(4):562-563. 被引量:5
  • 3刘峰,杨亚东,丁中,张峰.修复后前牙美学临床评价与患者满意度关系的初探[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2007,42(2):90-93. 被引量:30
  • 4Müller HP,Eger T.Gingival phenotypes in young male adults[J].J Clin Periodontol,1997,24(1):65 -71.
  • 5Seibert J,Lindhe J.Esthetics and periodontal therapy[M].2nd ed.Denmark:Munksgaard,1989:477 -514.
  • 6Olsson M,Lindhe J,Marinello CP.On the relationship between crown form and clinical features of the gingiva in adolescents[J].J Clin Periodontol,1993,20(8):570 -577.
  • 7Vandana KL,Savitha B.Thickness of gingiva in association with age,gender and dental arch location[J].J Clin Periodontol,2005,32(7):828-830.
  • 8Simonsen RJ. Preventive resin restoration (1). Quintessence lnl, 1978,9( 1 ) :69-76.
  • 9Radike AW. Criteria for diagnosis of dental caries// American dental Association. Proceedings of the Conference on the Clinical Testing of Cariostafic Agents. Chicago : American dental Assnciation, 1972:87- 88.
  • 10Ryge G, Snyder M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. J Am Dent Assoc, 1973,87(2) :369-377.

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部