期刊文献+

瘦身与强体:谈《监督法》的为与不为

Between thinning and strengthening:comments on what to do and not to do of Inspection Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 倍受各界关注的《监督法》终于2006年8月份通过,可谓20年坚修终成正果,那么何以如此?它规定的监督权行使原则、监督主体、监督对象及监督内容与人们一直关注的监督法相比有哪些变化?这背后的原因与深意为何?下面将试解释之。 Inspection Law was eventually passed after twenty years. Analyzing the content of Inspection Law and reviewing the history of its birth, we are easy to know that Inspection Law has changed much about inspection authority in exercise principle, inspection subject, inspection object and inspection content, in comparison with concerns of its content since the drafts of Inspection Law. The difference between Inspection Law and all of its drafts shows that the law was strengthened in some respects as well as shortened on the other hand. Inspection Law embodies an idea of legislation that to do should do well, or not to do at all, which is the reason for all of change.
作者 张凤英
机构地区 山东大学法学院
出处 《济宁师范专科学校学报》 2007年第1期89-94,共6页 Journal of Jining Teachers College
关键词 监督权行使原则 监督主体 监督对象 监督内容 inspection authority in exencise pninciple inspection subjelt inspection object inspection content
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献6

  • 1江晓阳.我国人大会议公开制度浅析[J].法学评论,1999,17(1):32-37. 被引量:9
  • 2.邓小平文选(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1993..
  • 3.《社会契约论》[M].,..
  • 4宫泽俊义.日本国宪法精解[M].中国民主法制出版社,1990.P336.
  • 5姜明安.健全行政程序立法是完善民主政治和建立市场经济体制的需要[J].中国法学,1995,(6).
  • 6斯坦利·费尔希等.经济学(上册)[M].庄巨忠等译.北京:中国财政经济出版社,1989.25.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部