期刊文献+

有限元法探讨犬下颌不全截骨牵张的最佳截骨量 被引量:5

Determination of optimum corticotomy of canine mandibular partial-cortical-cutting distraction osteogenesis by finite element anaysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的利用不完全截骨牵张成骨重建犬下颌节段缺失的有限元模型,控制截骨程度,探讨最佳截骨量。方法有限元模型模拟不完全截骨,在加力(12N)牵张过程中观察犬下颌皮质骨逐渐加大截骨量时截骨部位的VonMises应力,并与犬下颌骨的极限抗拉强度比较,以获得牵引时不发生断裂(骨折)的最少剩余皮质骨量。结果牵张过程中当连接处骨片剩余1mm时,滑动骨块和骨片的连接处VonMises应力是47.76MPa,最接近犬下颌骨的极限抗拉强度(约49.35MPa)。结论犬下颌行半侧不全截骨牵张成骨时,当连接骨片的剩余宽度小于1mm时,将大大增加牵张区骨折的危险性。 Objective To investigate the degree of corticotomy and find the optimum and minimum width by means of finite element model of canine mandibular partial-cortical-cutting distraction osteogenesis. Methods The finite element analysis model was established based on canine mandible and partial-cortical-cutting distraction osteogenesis simulated on the model. The Von Mises stress was observed at corticotomy site and compared with Qu of canine mandibular cortical bone (about 49. 35Mpa) during distraction osteogenesis with a force of 12 newton, when the cutting was progressed. The critical thickness of remaining bone was then decided. Results The Von Mises stress of the joint between the bone slice and the slide segment was 47.76 Mpa when the bone slide segment was retained for a thickness of 1 mm, which was most proximal to Qo (about 49.35MPa) of canine mandibular cortical bone. Conclusion The risk of fracture would increase markedly when retaining thickness of bone was less than 1 mm at the corticotomy site during canine mandibular partial-cortical-cutting distraction osteogenesis.
出处 《北京口腔医学》 CAS 2007年第5期248-250,共3页 Beijing Journal of Stomatology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(NO:30540046) 北京市自然科学基金资助(NO.7042058) 解放军总医院2007年度苗圃基金资助
关键词 下颌骨 牵张成骨 截骨 有限元 Canine Mandible Distraction osteogenesis Corticotomy Finite element
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献30

  • 1周敬安,赵亚群,颜绪涛,汪伟.颅骨成形术中的计算机个性化辅助设计6例报道[J].中国康复理论与实践,2004,10(5):318-319. 被引量:41
  • 2[1]McCarthy JG,Schreiber J,Karp N,et al.Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction.Plast Reconstr Surg,1992,89(1):1-10.
  • 3[3]Garcia AG,Martin MS,Vila PG,et al.Minor complications arising in alveolar distraction osteogenesis.J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2002,60(5):496-501.
  • 4[6]Chin M,Toth BA.Le Fort Ⅲ advancement with gradual distraction using internal devices.Plast Reconstr Surg,1997,100(4):819-830.
  • 5[7]Diner PA,Kollar EM,Martinez H,et al.Intraoral distraction for mandibular lengthening:a technical innovation.J Craniomaxillofac Surg,1996,24(2):92-95.
  • 6[8]Block MS,Chang A,Crawford C.Mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation in the dog using distraction osteogenesis.J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1996,54(3):309-314.
  • 7[9]Oda T,Sawaki Y,Ueda M.Experimental alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis using a simple device that permits secondary implant placement.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2000,15(1):95-102.
  • 8[10]Block MS,Gardiner D,Almerico B,et al.Loaded hydroxylapatite-coated implants and uncoated titanium-threaded implants in distracted dog alveolar ridges.Oral Surg,2000,89(6):676-685.
  • 9[11]Ilizarov GA.The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues (Part Ⅰ):the influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation.Clin Orthop,1989,238:249-281.
  • 10[12]Ilizarov GA.The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues (Part Ⅱ):the influence of the rate and frequency of distraction.Clin Orthop,1989,239:263-285.

共引文献78

同被引文献25

  • 1周敬安,赵亚群,颜绪涛,汪伟.颅骨成形术中的计算机个性化辅助设计6例报道[J].中国康复理论与实践,2004,10(5):318-319. 被引量:41
  • 2Farhadieh RD, et al.Effect of distraction rate on biomechanical,mineralization,and histologic properties of an ovine mandible model.Plast Reconstr Surg[J]. 2000,105:889.
  • 3B.ichards M, Waanders NA, Weiss JA,et al.Reduced gap strains induce changes in bone regeneration during distraction. J Biowech Eng[J]. 1999 Jun;121 (3):348-55.
  • 4Remmler D, Olson L, Ekstrom R,et al. Pre-surgical CT/FEA for craniofacial distraction: I. Methodology, development, and validation of the cranial finite element model. Med Eng Phys[J]. 1998 Nov;20(8):607- 19.
  • 5Basciftci FA, Korkmaz HH, Iseri H,et al.Biomechanical evaluation of mandibular nddline distraction osteogenesls by using the Finite element method. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop[J]. 2004 Jun;125(6): 706-15.
  • 6Guerrero C.Rapid mandibular expansion[J].Rev Venez Ortod,1990,1(3):48-50.
  • 7Zhou HZ,Hu M,Hu KJ,et al.Transport distraction osteogenesis using nitinol spring:An exploration in canine mandible[J].J Craniofac Surg,2006,17(5):943-949.
  • 8Zhou HZ,Hu M,Hu KJ,et al.Transport distraction osteogenesis usingnitinol spring:an exploration in canine mandible. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery . 2006
  • 9Guerrero C. Rapid mandibular expansion[J]. Rev Venez Ortod, 1990, 1(3): 48-50.
  • 10Farhadieh RD. Effect of distraction rate on biomechanical, min- eralization, and histologic properties of an ovine mandible model[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2000, 105(3): 889-895.

引证文献5

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部