期刊文献+

全数字化乳腺摄影与磁共振检查对乳腺癌诊断的比较影像学研究 被引量:1

Comparative analysis of full-field digital mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of malignant breast tumor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的回顾性分析数字化乳腺摄影(FFDM)与磁共振检查在乳腺癌诊断中的应用价值。方法从2004年7月至2006年7月期间因乳腺肿块在我院接受数字化乳腺摄影及磁共振动态增强检查的患者共93例,与病理组织学对照,分析两种检查对乳腺癌的诊断能力以及乳腺癌的影像学表现特征。结果FFDM诊断乳腺癌敏感度84.48%,特异度80.00%,阳性预测值87.50%,阴性预测值75.68%,准确度为82.80%;多灶性病变检出率55.56%;FFDM簇状钙化灶检出率(29/69)明显高于MRI(7/69)。MRI诊断乳腺癌敏感度94.82%,特异度为97.14%,阳性预测值98.21%,阴性预测值91.89%,准确度为95.69%;多灶性病变检出率83.33%。病灶周围"毛刺征"、环形增强和快进快出型时间~信号曲线为乳腺癌特征性表现。结论FFDM对乳腺微小钙化灶敏感,适用于乳腺癌普查;MRI诊断乳腺癌敏感性、特异性高,是进行乳腺癌术前评价的有效方法。 Objective To retrospectively compare the efficacy of full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of mammary cancer. Methods 93 cases suspected mammary lesions both received FFDM and MRI examinations . Compared with pathology, we analyzed the imaging features of mammary cancer in these two methods and investigated the capability of these two methods in mammary cancer diagnosis. Results The sensitivity, specificity, predictive value of positive cases, predictive value of negative cases and accuracy of FFDM in mammary cancer were 84.48%, 80.00%, 87.50%,75.68% and 82.80% respectively; the detection rate for multi-focus was 55.56%. And the detection rate for microcalcifications in FFDM examination (29/69) was much higher than in MRI (7/69). The sensitivity, specificity, predictive value of positive cases, predictive value of negative cases and accuracy of MRI in mammary cancer diagnosis were 94.82%, 97.14%, 98.21%, 91.89% and 95.69% ,respectively; the detection rate for multi-focus was 83.33%. The spiculate margin, ringed enhancement of the peripheral part of tumor and the fast-in-and-fast-out type of the time-signal intensity curve were the diagnostic signs of breast cancer. Conclusion FFDM was sensitive for breast microcalcifications and could be feasible for breast cancer screening. MRI had a high sensitivity and specificity for breast cancer diagnosis, which could be effective for pre-operation estimation.
出处 《影像诊断与介入放射学》 2007年第5期219-223,共5页 Diagnostic Imaging & Interventional Radiology
关键词 乳腺疾病 数字化乳腺摄影 磁共振成像 Breast neoplasms Digital mammography Magentic rescnance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Kinkel K, Hylton NM.Challenges to interpretation of breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2001,13:821-829.
  • 2刘万花,郑凯尔,金爱萍,张元宁,高修成,何洁,张亚男.全数字化乳腺摄影对临床未触及肿块乳癌的诊断价值[J].实用放射学杂志,2004,20(9):834-836. 被引量:18
  • 3刘小娟,翟仁友,蒋涛,王丽.乳腺磁共振成像:组织学与病灶定性、定量特征的相关性[J].实用放射学杂志,2004,20(12):1121-1126. 被引量:5
  • 4Leong CS, Daniel BL, Herfkens RJ, et al.Characterization of breast lesion morphology with delayed 3DSSMT: an adjunct to dynamic breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging,2000,11: 87-96.
  • 5Kuhl CK, Schild HH, Dynamic image interpretation of MRI of the breast, Magn Reson Imaging, 2000,12:965-974.
  • 6Yeh ED, Slanetz PJ, Edmister WB, et al. Invasive lobular carcinoma: spectrum of enhancement and morphology on magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J,2003,9:13-18.
  • 7Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology,1999,211:110.

二级参考文献26

  • 1Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Schorn C,et al. Full-field digital mammography: dose-dependent detectability of breast lesions and microcalcinosis[J].Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr,2000,172(12):1052-1056.
  • 2Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D'orsi CJ,et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations[J].Radiology,2001,218(3):873-880.
  • 3Fischer U, Baum F, Obenauer S,et al. Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography[J].Eur Radiol,2002,12(11):2679-2683.
  • 4Michell MJ. Breast cancer screening[J].Int J Clin Pract,2001,55(8):531-535.
  • 5Park BW, Kim SI, Kim MH,et al. Clinical breast examination for screening of asymptomatic women: the importance of clinical breast examination for breast cancer detection[J].Yonsei Med J,2000,41(3):312-318.
  • 6Nuns LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG. Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model [ J]. Radiology, 2001, 219 ( 2 ): 484 -494.
  • 7Orel SG, Schnal MD, LiVolsi VA, et al. Suspicious breast lesions:MR imaging with radiologic - pathologic correlation [ J ]. Radiology,1994, 190(2): 485 -493.
  • 8Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer[ J]. Radiology,2001, 220 ( 1 ):13 - 30.
  • 9Hochman MG, Orel SG, Powell CM, et al. Fibroadenomas: MR imaging appearances with radiologic -histologic correlation[ J]. Radiology,1997, 204(1): 123 - 129.
  • 10Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without GD -DTPA [ J].Radiology, 1989, 170(3): 681 -686.

共引文献20

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部