期刊文献+

网上支付中的民事责任研究 被引量:6

On Civil Liabilities of Internet Payments
下载PDF
导出
摘要 最高存储金额限制可以有效控制电子货币网上支付风险,但银行卡中的风险承担问题比较复杂。经济分析、比较研究和法学分析的结论是,我国银行卡风险承担规则应建立在有"责任限制"的无过错责任之上。未获授权使用时持卡人承担的责任应限制在1000元以内,超过限额以上的损失由发卡银行承担。 Maximum stored value is an efficient way to control risks of internet payment by electronic money, and electronic money involves many complicated private and public law issues. After discussing the definition and legal nature of electronic money, this paper focu- ses on private law issues such as legal relationship, finality, adverse claims, issues in counterfeit electronic money, obligation of redemption, and public law issues such as legislative objectives, qualifications of issuing institution, supervision and anti-money laundering of electronic money.
作者 钟志勇
出处 《上海财经大学学报》 CSSCI 2007年第5期51-58,共8页 Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
基金 中国法学会重点课题<网上支付中的法律问题研究>(会研字[2003]3号)成果之一
关键词 网上支付 银行卡 风险承担机制 internet payment bankcard mechanism of risk-taking
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[1]See Survey of Developments in Electronic Money and Internet and Mobile Payments,2004,available at http://www.bis.org.
  • 2[2]See Robert Cooter & Edward Rubin,A Theory of Loss Allocation for Consumer Payments,66 Tex.L.Rev.,1987,pp.112~135.
  • 3[6]See Arnold Rosenberg,Better Than Cash? Consumer Protection and the Global Debit Card Deluge,2005,available at http://www.ssrn.com.
  • 4[8]See Randy Gainer,A Cyberspace Perspective:Allocating the Risk of Loss for Bankcard Fraud on the Internet,15 J.Marshall J.Computer & Info.L.,1996,p.44.
  • 5[1][美]简·温、本杰明·赖特.电子商务法(第四版)[M].北京:北京邮电大学出版社,2002,173.

同被引文献54

引证文献6

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部