期刊文献+

等离子质谱(ICP-MS)对高含量元素硫样品中微量元素分析的前处理方法比较 被引量:2

Comparing burning and sublimation methods in pretreatment of high element sulfur samples for microelement analysis with Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 如何去除元素硫高含量样品的背景硫,是测定该类样品中微量元素成功的关键.通过分别对样品进行燃烧和升华两种前处理方法的研究对比,得出用升华的方法处理自然硫样品对于其微量元素的测定可靠性大,所测定微量元素回收率的优良率是68%,燃烧法处理后测定微量元素回收率的优良率是64%.而且前者优良回收率的范围是79.9%~120.5%,明显高于后者的优良回收率范围76.2%~98。0%.对于这样的结果,温度是主要的控制因素.燃烧法处理样品温度条件较难控制,升华法则可以较严格的控制温度,从而减少被测元素的散失,能得到较为理想的数据. How to wipe off sulfur-background is a key step to quantify microelements in certain samples containing high concentration of sulfur. By comparing data from both burning and sublimation methods for pretreatment samples containing high sulfur, it suggested that the sublimation method gave a much reliable result. The choiceness ratio of recovery is 68% for decided microelements by sublimation method, while the choiceness ratio of recovery is 64% by burning method. Moreover, the former range of recovery is 79.9% ~ 120.5% which is higher than the latter, ranging the recovery from 76.2% to 98.0%. The temperature is the key factor to be controlled, as its significant influence to the results. It is difficult to control the burning method and it is easy for sublimation method. Thereby better data can be achieved by decreasing element-decided loss with sublimation method of pretreatment.
出处 《台湾海峡》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第4期596-600,共5页 Journal of Oceanography In Taiwan Strait
基金 中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(KZCX3-SW-223) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(40376020)
关键词 高背景基质 燃烧法 升华法 等离子质谱 high background burning method sublimation method ICP-MS sulfur
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Alonso A J, Bottrell S H, Tritlla J. Sulfur redox reactions and formation of native sulfur veins during low grade metamorphism of gypsum evaporites, Cameros Basin (NE Spain) [J]. Chemical Geology, 2001, 174:389 - 402.
  • 2刘长华,曾志刚,殷学博,陈镇东.台湾岛东北部龟山岛附近海域自然硫烟囱体的基本特征研究[J].台湾海峡,2006,25(3):309-317. 被引量:8
  • 3Marumo K, Hattori K H. Seafloor hydrothermal clay alteration at Jade in the back-arc Okinawa Trough: mineralogy, geochemistry and isotope characteristics [ J ]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1999, 63 (18) : 2 785 - 2 804.
  • 4Stuben D, Bloomer S H, Taibi N E, et al. First results of study of sulphur-rich hydrothermal activity from an island-arc environment : Esmeralda Bank in the Mariana Arc [ J ]. Marine Geology, 1992, 103: 521 - 528.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Chen C H, Shieh Y N, Lee T,et al. Nd-Sr-O isotopic evidence for source contamination and unusual mantle component under Luzon Arc[ J ]. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1990,54:2 473 - 2 484.
  • 2Chen C H, Lee T, Shieh Y N, et al. Magmatism at the onset of back-arc basin spreading in the Okinawa Trough[ J ]. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 1995,69 : 313 - 322.
  • 3Letouzey J, Kimura M. Okinawa Trough genesis: structure and evolution of a back arc basin developed in a continent [J]. Mar Pet Geol, 1985,2:111 -130.
  • 4Lee T Q. Formal mechanism solution and their tectonic implications in Taiwan region [ J ]. Bull Inst Earth Sci, Acad Sin, 1983,3:37-54.
  • 5Teng L S. Extensional collapse of the northern Taiwan mountain belt[ J ]. Geology, 1996,24: 949 - 952.
  • 6Chen Y G, Wu W S, Chen C H, et al. A date for volcanic eruption inferred from a siltstone xenolith[ J].Quaternary Science Reviews, 2001,20: 869 - 873.
  • 7郭富雯.龟山岛海底热液活动初步调查[D].台北:台湾中山大学,2001.26.
  • 8Fouquet Y, Von S U, Charlou J L, et al. Hydrothermal activity and metallogenesis in the Lau back-arc basin[J]. Nature, 1991,349:778 -781.
  • 9Fouquet Y, Auelair G, Cambon P, et al. Geological setting and mineralogical and geochemical investigations on sulfide deposits near 13°N on the East Pacific Rise[J]. Marine Geology, 1988,84:145 ~ 178.
  • 10Chang M D, Chen J C. Geochemistry of andesites from Kueishantao[ J]. Acta Oceanogr Taiwan, 1979,9:39 - 49.

共引文献7

同被引文献27

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部