摘要
为了检验评价理论在司法领域的应用并探讨其使用规律,本文分析了律师如何在强调客观性的法庭辩论中体现自己作为法律阐释者与辩护人的双重主观立场。分析结果表明,在解决法律纠纷的过程中,律师综合运用大量的态度系统与级差系统,使用多种语言手段,尤其是句法、篇章结构等非一致性表达方式,在庭审辩论中表现自己的主体意识与情态。
With a view to testing the applicability of the Appraisal Theory in judicial discourse in China, this paper analyzes how lawyers negotiate, in the court trial where objectivity is deemed as essential, their double subjectivities as both law interpreters and defense attorney. The analyses indicate that the integration of ATTITUDE and GRADUATION, realized by a versatile means of language forms along with grammatical patterns and textual structure, has enabled the lawyers to give a display of their subjective stance in the process of dispute resolution.
出处
《外语教学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第6期29-33,共5页
Foreign Language Education
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地基金资助
项目批准号06JJD740006
关键词
法庭辩论
评价资源
主观性
court debate
appraisal resources
subjectivity
