期刊文献+

基于粗糙集的供应链绩效改进决策研究 被引量:9

Study of supply chain performance improving decision-making based on rough sets
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从知识发现和数据挖掘的角度,利用粗糙集的理论和方法,建立了基于粗糙集的供应链绩效改进决策模型框架,并给出其中的指标约简方法和基于分辨矩阵计算指标权重的数学模型。最后结合一个制造业供应链绩效评价实例,首先对其基于平衡记分卡的指标体系进行了约简,然后建立了基于粗糙集的供应链绩效改进决策模型,确定了指标的客观权重。并对结果进行了分析,提出了绩效改进决策意见和措施。 This paper complies with knowledge discovery and data mining,uses theory and method of rough sets,sets up the decision-nlaking model of supply chain performance improving based on rough sets,and gives method of reduction and mathematic model of calculating index weight based on discernable matrix.Finally it takes a case of manufacturing industry, supply chain performance evaluating for example,reduces the index of manufacturing industry supply chain performance measures and metrics based on Balanced-Scorecard,then it establishes the decision-making model of supply chain performance improving based on rough sets,gives objective weight,analyzes the result,and brings forward performance improving suggestion and measurement,
出处 《计算机工程与应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第32期185-188,224,共5页 Computer Engineering and Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金(No.70272034)。~~
关键词 粗糙集 供应链 约简 分辨矩阵 供应链绩效改进决策模型 rough sets supply chain reduction discernable matrix supply chain performance improving decision-making model
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献58

  • 1蔺军龙,纪嘉伦,李福志,梁栋.铁路保价运输指标评价体系的实施研究[J].铁道货运,2002,20(1):45-47. 被引量:1
  • 2Baader F, et al. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory,Implementation and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • 3Brachman R J, Schmolze J G. An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science, 1985, 9(2): 171-216.
  • 4Schmidt-Schauβ M, Smolka G. Attributive concept descriptions with complements. Artificial Intelligence, 1991, 48(1) : 1-26.
  • 5Reiter R. A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence,1980, 13(1): 81-132.
  • 6McCarthy J. Circumscription-A form of non-monotonic reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 1980, 13(1): 27-39.
  • 7Brewka G. Nonmonotonic Reasoning- Logical Foundations of Commonsense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
  • 8Baader F, Hullunder B. Embedding defaults into terminological representation systems. Journal of Automated Reasoning,1995, 14(1): 149-180.
  • 9Baader F, Hollunder B. Priorities on defaults with prerequisites, and their application in treating specificity in terminological default logic. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 1995, 15(1): 41-68.
  • 10Haarslev V, Moeller R, Turhan A Y, Wessel M. On terminological default reasoning about spatial information: Extended abstract. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Description Logics (DL' 99), Linkoping, Sweden, 1999. 155-159.

共引文献146

同被引文献68

引证文献9

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部