期刊文献+

EST对预防急性胆源性胰腺炎复发的临床价值 被引量:1

Clinical implications of endoscopic sphincterotomy in preventing recurrence of acute biliary pancreatitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨内镜下乳头括约肌切开(endoscopic sphincterotomy,EST)对预防急性胆源性胰腺炎(acutebiliary pancreatitis,ABP)复发的临床价值。方法将临床治愈的296例ABP患者分为EST治疗组(n=119)和非EST对照组(n=177)。将两组患者进一步分为胆囊切除组和非胆囊切除组。随访所有ABP患者,比较两组复发率有无显著差异。结果两组ABP患者平均随访时间32±14月;15例失访,随访率94.9%。EST治疗组(11/113)的复发率明显低于非EST治疗组(75/168),差异有显著性(P<0.01);胆囊切除虽然能降低ABP的复发率,但其差异无显著性地(P>0.05)。结论应用EST技术治疗ABP,可预防ABP的再次发作。 Objective To determine the clinical value of endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) in preventing the recurrence of acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP). Methods Two hundred and ninety-six cured patients with ABP were divided into EST treatment group (n = 119) and non-EST control group (n = 177). Each group was further broken down into cholecystectomy group and non-cholecystectomy group. Follow-up visits were paid to all patients with ABP and comparisons were made to see whether the recurrence rate of the cases between the two groups had any significant importance. Results All patients with ABP, except 15 patients who were loss to follow up, were followed up for 32 ± 14 months, with a response rate being 94.9%. The recurrence rate for the cases in EST group (11/113) was significantly lower than that in non-EST control group (75/168) (P 〈 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between cholecystectomy group and non-cholecystectomy group when further comparison was made (P 〉 0.05), although cholecystectomy could reduce the recurrence rate of the patients with ABP. Conclusion The treatment of patients with ABP by using EST can prevent the recurrence of the disease.
出处 《现代消化及介入诊疗》 2007年第3期150-152,共3页 Modern Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment in Gastroenterology
关键词 胆源性胰腺炎 预防 ERCP EST Acute biliary pancreatitis Prevention Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Endoscopic sphincterotomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[1]Neoptolemos JP,Carr-Locke DL,London NJ,et al.Controlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones.Lancet 1988;2:979-983.
  • 2[2]Soetikno RM,Carr-Locke DL.Endoscopic management of acute gallstone pancreatitis.Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1998;8:1-12.
  • 3[3]Siegel JH,Veerappan A,Cohen SA,et al.Endoscopic sphincterotomy for biliary pancreatitis:an alternative to cholecystectomy in high-risk patients.Gastrointest Endosc 1994;40:573-575.
  • 4[4]Hammarstrom LE,Stridbeck H,Ihse I.Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy and interval cholecystectomy on late outcome after gallstone pancreatitis.Br J Surg 1998;85:333-336.
  • 5[5]Kaw M,Al-Antably Y,Kaw P.Management of gallstone pancreatitis:cholecystectomy or ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy.Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:61-65.
  • 6[6]Sugiyama M,Atomi Y.Risk factors for acute biliary pancreatitis.Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:210-212.
  • 7王自法,潘承恩,刘绍诰.重症急性胰腺炎发病机理研究进展[J].中华普通外科杂志,1999,14(2):144-146. 被引量:105

二级参考文献4

  • 1王自法,新消化病学杂志,1998年,7期,170页
  • 2刘续宝,华西医科大学学报,1997年,28卷,218页
  • 3毛恩强,中华外科杂志,1997年,35卷,150页
  • 4严律南,中华消化杂志,1990年,10卷,32页

共引文献104

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部