期刊文献+

直肠脱出技术在腹腔镜低位直肠前切除术中的应用 被引量:5

Prolapsing technique in laparoscopy-assisted low anterior resec- tion
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨直肠脱出技术在腹腔镜低位直肠前切除术中应用可行性与治疗效果。方法回顾性分析2005年10月至2007年3月上海微创外科临床医学中心为9例低位直肠肿瘤病人运用直肠脱出技术行腹腔镜低位直肠前切除术的临床资料,研究其手术操作、术后恢复、肿瘤根治性效果及随访结果。结果男6例,女3例,平均年龄58(40~75)岁。腺瘤2例,Ⅰ期病例6例,Ⅱ期1例。所有病例无术中严重并发症和手术死亡,无中转开腹手术;平均手术时间195(150~232)min、平均术中出血55(25~100)ml,病人术后排气时间、留置导尿管时间和术后住院天数分别为2(1~4)d,7(5—10)d和11(7~20)d。清扫淋巴结总数12(9~20)枚,肿瘤距下切缘距离为1.6(1.0~3.8)cm。无严重术后并发症。随访12(4—21)个月,无局部复发和远处转移,排便功能恢复较满意。结论直肠脱出技术运用于腹腔镜低位直肠前切除术安全有效,符合肿瘤根治原则,且能获得较满意的排便功能恢复。 Objective To assess the feasibility and outcome of prolapsing technique in laparoscopy-assisted low anterior resection for low rectal tumor. Methods The technique of operation, status of recovery, complications, oncological clearance and results of short-term foflow-up were studied in 9 patients underwent laparoscopy-assisted low anterior resection with a prolapsing technique for low rectal tumor between Oct. 2005 and Mar. 2007. Results No case was converted to open surgery. The mean operative time was 195 ( 150 -232) min and the blood loss was 55 (25 ~ 100) ml. The mean time for passage of flatus, duration of urinary drainage, and that of postoperative hospital stay were 2 ( 1 ~ 4) d ,7 (5 - 10 ) d and 11 (7 - 20) d respectively. The total number of lymph nodes harvest was 12 (9 - 20), and the mean distal margin from the tumor was 1.6 ( 1.0 - 3.8) cm. No major complication was observed. The mean foflow-up time was 12 (4 - 21 ) months. No local recurrence or metastasis was observed. Acceptable anal function results were obtained in most patients. Conclusion Laparoscopy-assisted low anterior resection with a prolapsing technique can be successfully performed.
出处 《国际外科学杂志》 2007年第11期730-732,共3页 International Journal of Surgery
关键词 腹腔镜 低位直肠前切除 直肠癌 直肠脱出技术 laparoscopy low anterior resection rectal cancer prolapsing technique
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoseopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial) : muhicentre, randomised controlled trial [J] . Lancet, 2005,365(9472) :1718-1726.
  • 2Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial[J]. Lancet Oncol. 2005.6 (7) ,477-484.
  • 3汪迎,潘凯.腹腔镜直肠癌手术的研究现状和发展趋势[J].国际外科学杂志,2006,33(1):34-37. 被引量:8
  • 4Fukunaga M, Kidokoro A, Iba T, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted low anterior resection with a prolapsing technique for low rectal cancer [J]. Surg Today,2005,35(7) :598-602.
  • 5宗雅萍,冯波,陆爱国,马君俊,李健文,王明亮,胡伟国,董峰,臧潞,毛志海,郑民华.腹腔镜直肠全系膜切除治疗中低位直肠癌的前瞻性非随机对照研究[J].外科理论与实践,2006,11(5):393-396. 被引量:30
  • 6Prete F, Prete FP, De Luca R, et al. Restorative proctectomy with colon pouch-anal anastomosis by laparoscopic transanal pull-through : an available option for low rectal cancer[J]. Surg Endosv,2007,21 ( 1 ) :91-96.
  • 7Ruller E, Sa Cunha A, Couderc P, et al. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with coloplasty and coloanal anastomosis for mid and low rectal cancer[J]. Br J Surg, 2003,90(4) :445-451.
  • 8Tiret E, Poupardin B, McNamara D, et al. Ultralow anterior resection with intersphincteric dissection-what is the limit of safe sphincter preservation [ J]. Colorectal Dis ,2003,5 (5) :454-457.

二级参考文献37

  • 1陆爱国,郑民华,冯波,李健文,胡艳艳,王明亮,胡伟国,董峰,毛志海,臧潞,蒋渝.腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术根治结肠癌[J].外科理论与实践,2004,9(6):464-466. 被引量:20
  • 2Hong D, Lewis M, Tabet J, et al. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open resection for benign colorectal disease, Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2002, 12 : 238-242.
  • 3Pikarsky A J, Rosenthal R, Weiss EG, et al. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc, 2002, 16:558-562.
  • 4Ziprin P, Ridgway PE, Peck DH, et al. The theories and realities of port-site metastases: a critical appraisal. J Am Coll Surg, 2002,195: 395-408.
  • 5Neuhaus SJ, Watson DI, Ellis T, et al. The effect of immune enhancement and suppression of the development of laparoscopic port site metastases. Surg Endosc, 2004, 14: 439-443.
  • 6Whelan RL, Franklin M, Holuber SD, et al, Postoperative cell mediated immune respose is better preserved after laparoscopic vs open colorectal resection in humans. Surg Endosc, 2003, 17: 972-978.
  • 7Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Bonier HJ. Effect of laparoscopy on the immune system. Semin Laparosc Surg, 2004, 11: 37-44.
  • 8Ordemann J, Jacobi CA, Schwenk W, et al. Cellular and humoral inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections. Surg Endosc, 2001, 15:600-608.
  • 9Tang CL, Eu KW, Tai BC, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of open versus laparoscopically assisted colectomy on systemic immunity in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2001, 88:801-807.
  • 10Wittich P, Mearadji A, Marquet RL, et al. Irrigation of port site:prevention of pot site metastases? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2004, 14: 125-129.

共引文献36

同被引文献94

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部