期刊文献+

董事会特征对会计信息披露质量的影响——来自我国上市公司的经验证据 被引量:6

The Effect of Board of Director on Quality of Accounting Information Disclosure——Empirical Evidence from China's Listed Corporate
下载PDF
导出
摘要 检验了我国董事会制度改革对强制性和自愿性信息披露质量的影响。研究发现:独立董事比例、独立董事超过1/3、"二元"领导权结构、财务专业背景的独立董事比例、审计委员会的存在、以及公司规模和雇佣"四大"与会计信息披露质量成显著正相关;灰色董事和内部董事超过1/3、配股动机与会计信息披露质量成显著负相关;而董事会规模、董事会会议次数、CEO变更、董事持股比例和财务杠杠与会计信息披露质量不显著。此外,还发现独立董事超过1/3、"二元"领导权结构、财务专业背景的独立董事比例和审计委员会的存在是影响强制性和自愿性信息披露质量最为显著的因素。 This paper investigates the impact of board of director on quality of accounting information disclosure in China.h is found that the proportion of independent director,the number of independent director exceeding over half, "dual class" leader structure ,the existence of audit committee ,director profession ,firm size and hiring "Big Four"are positive significantly with on quality of accounting information disclosure;and that the number of grey director and internal director exceeding over half, offering rights are negative significantly with on quality of accounting information disclosure;but that board size,board meeting frequency,CEO takeover,director ownership and leverage are irrelative with on quality of accounting information disclosure.Moreover,among the characters,we found that the number of independent director exceeding over half, "dual class"leader structure,director profession and the existence of audit committee had the most effect on quality of accounting information disclosure.
作者 向凯
出处 《价值工程》 2007年第11期136-142,共7页 Value Engineering
基金 广州市哲学社会科学发展"十.五"规划课题"公司治理结构对会计信息披露质量影响的实证检验"(YZ1-56)
关键词 董事会特征 会计信息披露质量 信息披露指数 回归分析 board of director characteristics information disclosure quality information disclosure index regression analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Fama E F.Agency Problem and the Theory of the Firm,Journal of Political Economy[J].1980,88:288-308.
  • 2Healy P and K Palepu.Information asymmetry,corporate disclosure,and the capital markets:A review of the empirical disclosure literature.Journal of Accounting & Economics[J].2001.31:405-440.
  • 3Yermack David.Higher Market Valuation for Firms with a Small Board of Directors[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1996,40:185-211.
  • 4Beasley M.An empirical Analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud[J].Accounting Review,1996,71:443-465.
  • 5Hermalin B,Weisbach,M.Endogenously Chosen Boards of Directors and Their Monitoring of the CEO.
  • 6American Economic Review,1998,88:96-118.
  • 7Fan J P H and T J Wong.Do External Auditors Perform a Corporate Governance Role in Emerging Markets Evidence from East Asia.Working Paper,2001,The Hong Kong university of Science and Technology.
  • 8Bushman R,Q Chen,E Engel and A Smith.The sensitivity of corporate governance systems to the Timeliness of accounting earnings.Working paper,2000.University of Chicago.
  • 9Leung Richard D Morris and Sidney J.Gray,Corporate Transparency in CHINA:Factors Influencing Financial Disclosure Levels,Working Paper,2005,School of Accounting University of New South Wales.
  • 10Xie B,Davidson W,DaDalt P.Earnings Management and Corporate Governance:the Role of the Board and the Audit Committee[J].Journal of Corporate Finance,9:295-316.

二级参考文献43

  • 1葛家澍.未来财务会计和财务报告的模式──兼论会计信息的可靠性与相关性[J].财务与会计,1999(2):6-9. 被引量:41
  • 2许小年 王燕 梁能主编.中国上市公司的所有制结构与公司治理[A]..公司治理结构:中国的实践与美国的经验[C].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000..
  • 3青木昌彦 见胡鞍钢 胡光宇编.2002《公司治理的比较制度分析》[A].见胡鞍钢,胡光宇编.《公司治理中外比较》[C].北京新华出版社,2004年版..
  • 4泰勒尔1988.《产业组织理论》[M].北京中国人民大学出版社,1997年版..
  • 5因内恩·马克—斯达德勒 丁·大卫·佩雷斯—卡斯特里罗1994.《信息经济学引论:激励与合约》[M].上海财经大学出版社,2004年版..
  • 6Come, Ronald, 1937, The Nature of the Finn, Economics 4, 386-405.
  • 7Claessens,S, S Djankov and L H P Lang, 2000, "The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations", Journal of Financial Economics, 58,81- 112.
  • 8Faccio, M and L H P Lang , 2002,"The Ultimate Ownership of Western European Corporations", Journal of Financial Economics 65, 365-396.
  • 9Fama,Eugence, and Michael Jensen, 1983a, Separation of Ownership and Control, Journal of Law and Economics 26, 301-325.
  • 10Fama,Eugence, and Michael Jensen, 1983b, Agency Problems and Residuals Claims, Journal of Law and Economics 26, 327-349.

共引文献1057

同被引文献85

引证文献6

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部