钱陆灿《文选》评点本探析

Distinguish Qian Lucan's Comment to Wenxuan

钱陆灿的《文选》评点在清代士子中间产生了一定影响。然而,笔者在整理明清《文选》评点本的过程中却发现,所谓的钱氏评本大部分内容实际都是抄录其前《文选》评点本而来,犹以抄录孙《文选瀹注》内容最多,其次是恽绍龙刻《文选纂注评林》、卢之颐刻《梁昭明文选》,及钟惺、谭元春《古诗归》。钱氏评本最值得注意的内容,是八十余条出自钱氏本人的以后世诗歌、尤其是唐诗"证选"的评语,较李详"唐诗证选"的做法早了二百余年,实开选学"证选"一途。

Qian Lucan＇s comment to Wenxuan has influenced the readers of Qing Dynasty. But we discovered that Qian Lucan＇s comment plagiarized the others content actually, the fvoluminous came from Sunkuang＇ Wenxuanyuezhu. But there are the valuable content in his works, that is some comments were to testify Wenxuan through the poem of Tang Dynasty, which was earlier than Lixiang. Qian Lucan opened a way to the research of Wenxuan.