期刊文献+

兼顾效益和成功率的区间数决策矩阵的一种综合排序方法 被引量:2

A Synthetic Ranking Approach Thinking of Both Benefit and Successful Probability for Interval Numbers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前的区间数的决策矩阵排序方法都只根据效益型准则进行的,而没有考虑到方案实施的成功率这个重要准则。本文提出了区间数的可行度概念,在此基础上给出了基于可行度的区间数决策矩阵的排序方法;然后提出了一种兼顾效益和成功率的区间数决策矩阵排序的综合评价方法,该方法能融合多方面的决策信息。文中给出了一个实例说明本法的有效性和可行性。 The ranking methods of interval numbers decision-making matrix have been given by the criterions of benefit at present, but the criterions of alternatives successful probability are not considered. A new concept of feasible degree for interval numbers is presented in this paper. The ranking methods of interval numbers decision-making matrix is proposed based on feasible degree for interval numbers decision-making matrix. Then the synthetic ranking approach with the criterions of benefit and successful probability is presented, which can integrate decision-making information from many aspects. A numerical example is illustrated to show the feasibility and effectiveness of the method.
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSCD 2007年第5期80-82,95,共4页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70571001) 安徽省自然科学基金资助项目(070416245) 安徽高等学校自然科学基金研究项目(KJ2007B125) 安徽省高校青年教师资助项目(2007jq1190) 安徽大学人才队伍建设资助项目
关键词 多属性决策 排序 可行度 成功系数 区间数决策矩阵 multiple attributes decision making (MADM) ranking feasible degree successful coefficient interval numbers decision-making matrix
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献27

  • 1陈挺.决策分析[M].北京:科学技术出版社,1987..
  • 2陈廷.决策分析[M].北京:科学出版社,1987.172-176.
  • 3陈Ting.决策分析[M].北京:科学出版社,1987..
  • 4樊治平.复杂多属性决策理论与方法的研究:博士学位论文[M].东北大学,1996..
  • 5徐泽水.模糊综合评价的排序方法研究[A]..Systems Engineering, Systems Science and Complexity Research [C].Research Information Ltd出版社, Hemel Hempstead Hp2 7TD, United Kingdom,2000.507- 511.
  • 6[1]Hwang C L, Yoon K. Muitiple attibute decision making[ M ]. New York:Springer- verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1981:1~10.
  • 7[3]Yoon K. The propagation of errors in multiple- attribute decision analysis: a practical approach [J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1989, 40 (7): 681~686.
  • 8[5]Bryson N, Mobolurin A. An action learning evaluation procedure for multiple criteria decision making problems [ J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, 96:379~386.
  • 9[6]Sajjad Zahir M. Incorporating the uncertainty of decision judgments in the analytic hierarchy process [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1991,53:206~216.
  • 10[7]Haines L M. A statistical approach to the analytic hierarchy process with interval judgements[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1998,110:112~125.

共引文献377

同被引文献72

引证文献2

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部