“知”的逻辑变奏——试论“濠梁之辩”的潜在进路

The Logical Alternation of "Knowing"——On the Potential Route 0f "the Debate on hao-liang"

庄子、惠施展开"濠梁之辩",探寻知的可能性、根据及知的方式,隐现出不同的思维进路。庄子的探讨进路富有变奏色彩,其以"道通为一"或类的相通为起点,肯定"鱼之乐"可知,进而将惠施"知何以可能"的质疑转化为"知"的方式,最后转换为"于何知",以"知"的空间场所作结。相对来说,惠施将"异类不比"的逻辑贯彻始终,对认知的可能性保持了悬置的态度。

The debate on Hao-liang＂ between Chuangz/and Hnishi to explore the possibility, basis and method of knowing, reveals the various approaches of thinking. The approach at Chuangzi＇ s exploration is full of aherafion, using ＂Unity and the Through- ness＂ as the startpoint to confirm the possibility of knowing ＇the pleasure of fish＂, changing Huishi ＇ s inquiry of ＂How is it possible to know＂ into ＂How to know＂, and then into ＂where to know＂ as the final conclusion ; Relatively, Huishi adheres to the logical principle of nonanalogy among differentkinds, keeping a suspicious attitude of the possibility of knowing.