摘要
排比问是问句的排比,《论语》和《孟子》中的排比问颇具语用价值。《论语》和《孟子》中的排比问具有一定的可比性。《孟子》排比问表示疑问的话语标记比《论语》的要繁丰一些,《孟子》排比问的语用价值主要诉诸"辩"体现出来,而《论语》排比问的语用价值则主要通过"辨"实现。
The comparative study of the parallel interrogative sentences in The Analects of Confucius and The Book of Mencius has much pragmatic value. There are more discourse marks referring to interrogation in The Book of Mencius than in The Analects of Confucius. The pragmatic value of the parallel interrogative sentences in The Book of Mencius is revealed in debate while that in The Analeas of Confucius is embodied in differentiation.
出处
《云南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2007年第6期127-130,共4页
Journal of Yunnan Normal University：Humanities and Social Sciences Edition
关键词
论语
孟子
排比问
话语标记
语用价值
The Analects of Confucius
The Book of Mencius
parallel interrogative sentence
discourse mark
pragmatic value
