期刊文献+

基层军官人格特质、应对方式与应对效能的关系研究

On the Relationship between Military Officers' Personal Character,Answering Strategy and Operational Effectiveness at the Grassroots' Level
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨人格特质、应对方式与应对效能的关系,研究前两者是否可以有效预测后者。方法:采用问卷调查法,以320名基层军官为被试。结果:稳定性、有恒性和自律性与应对效能及各维度存在正相关;忧虑性和紧张性与应对效能及各维度存在负相关;乐群性、聪慧性及幻想性与应对效能及各维度并不存在显著相关。积极应对与应对效能及各维度存在正相关,消极应对与胜任力、自信程度及应对效能存在负相关。结论:人格特质和应对方式均可以有效预测应对效能。 Objective:This article gives an in -depth analysis on the relationship between military officers' personal character, answering strategy and operational effectiveness at the grassroots' level. Methods : Through questionnaire survey on the 320 officers. Results : The result shows that there is positive correlationship between stability, persistenee, self - discipline and operational effeetiveness within all dimensions, while the negative correlationship exists between anxiety, tensity and operational effectiveness within all dimensions, and there' s no obvious correlationship between group - orientation, intelligence, fantasy property and operational effectiveness within all dimensions. Active answering strategy is positively correlated with operational effectiveness within all dimensions, while inactive answering strategy is negatively correlated with the competence, degree of self - confidence and operational effectiveness. Conclusion : The survey shows that either personal character or answering strategy can predict operational effectiveness effectively.
机构地区 西安政治学院
出处 《皖西学院学报》 2007年第5期1-4,共4页 Journal of West Anhui University
关键词 基层军官 应对效能 人格特质 应对方式 military officer at the grassroots' level operational effectiveness personal character answering strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献16

  • 1汪向东.心理卫生评定量表手册[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1993,:202-209.
  • 2Carter B D, Bendeu R D. et al. Behavioral Health: Focus onPreventive Child Health Behavior. In: Zeiner A R, Bendell R D,et al (eds), Health Psychology: Treatment and Research Issues.New York, Plenum Press, 1985. 8-19.
  • 3Andrews G. Life event stress, social support, coping style, and risk of psychological impairment. Nerve Mental Disorder, 1978, 166 :307-316.
  • 4Kraalj V, Garnefski N, et al. Negative life events and depressive symptoms in late adolescence: Bonding and cognitive coping as vulnerability factors? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2003, 32 (3) : 185-193.
  • 5肖计划 许秀峰.“应对方式问卷”效度和信度研究[M].中国心理卫生杂志,1996,10(4).164-168.
  • 6班杜拉 缪小春译.自我效能:控制的实施[M].华东师范大学出版社,2003.366-511.
  • 7Van Dick R, Wagner U. Stress and strain in teaching: A structural equation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology,2001,71(2): 243-259.
  • 8Sirbasku C, Sarah L. Parents of children diagnosed with pervasive developmental disorders: An examination of family strengths, coping, distress, and efficacy. Dissertation Abstracts International : Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 2001, 61(9 - B): 5006.
  • 9Benight C C ; Freyaldenhoven R W. et al. Coping self - efficacy and psychological distress following the Oklahoma City bombing.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2000, 30(7) : 1331-1344.
  • 10杨坚.个性结构研究中的五因素模式[J].中国临床心理学杂志,1997,5(1):56-60. 被引量:31

共引文献322

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部