证券公司投资组合市场风险与适足资本实证研究被引量：1

Empirical Study of Portfolio Management and Capital Adequacy of Securities Companies

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文按照巴塞尔新资本适足率规范,以中国85家证券公司实际自营投资组合为样本,采用基于VaR的内部模型法估算各公司自营投资的市场风险和应计提资本,并以之检验中国新老资本监管制度的有效性。实证结果显示,改革后的2006版资本监管制度比老制度有所改善,但对风险的反映不如内部模型法准确,监管制度改革的方向是内部模型法。因主要品种风险折扣比率设置偏低,新制度平均低估证券公司自营风险29%。建议监管规则依据VaR结果调整部分品种的风险折扣比率。 Based on Basil New Capital Protocol and sampled on proprietary trading portfolio of 85 Chinese securities companies, the author uses VAR inner models to assess their respective market risks and the accrual of capital, and test the effectiveness of China regulatory system of old and new capital. The studies reveal improvement in 06＇ capital regulatory system, although its response to risks is not as accurate as the inner models method, which should be the direction for regulatory reform. Due to its low risk discount rate on major instruments, an average of 29% discount on the proprietary trading risk is recorded. An adjustment based on VAR result is therefore proposed on certain instruments.

作者张怡李文伟

机构地区中国人民大学商学院华中科技大学经济学院

出处《证券市场导报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第11期66-71,共6页 Securities Market Herald

关键词证券公司资本充足性券商监管风险管理 securities companies capital adequacy supervision of securities firms risk management

分类号 F830.591 [经济管理—金融学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献14

1Bikker, J.A.& I.P.P, van Lelyveld. Economic versus Regulatory Capital for Financial Conglomerates[J].Research Series Supervision no.45, De Nederland Bank.2002.
2Calomiris, Charles & Gary Gorton. The Origins of Banking Panics: Models, Facts and Banking Regulations [J]. in G. Hubbard, Ed.: Financial Markets and Financial Crises (University of Chicago Press, Chicago). 1991.
3Cumming, Christine M., & Herring, Beverly J.. the Challenges of Risk Management in Diversified Financial Companies[J], Economic Policy Review, 2001. Mar, Vol. 7 Issue 1, p1, 17p
4Dimson ,Elroy & Marsh ,Paul. Capital Requirements for Securities Firms[J], The Journal of Finance, 1995.Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 821-851.
5Edwards, P.. Managing Risk and Capital in Financial Conglomerates[J].working paper, Australia Prudential Regulation Authority,1999.
6Engel, J. & Gizycki, Marianne. Conservatism, Accuracy and Efficiency: Comparing Value-at-Risk Models[J].Risk and Capital Management conference proceedings, Australian Prudential Regulation Authority,1999.pp.108-123
7Jackson, P., Maude, D. J. and Perraudin, W.. Bank Capital and Value at Risk[J].The Journal of Derivatives, 1997.4 (3):73-89.
8Panjer,Harry H. Measurement of Risk, Solvency Requirements and Allocation of CaPital within Financial Conglomerates[J].Intra Company Capital Allocation Papers, Society of Actuaries.2002.
9Skippar,H.D.. Financial Services Integration Worldwide: Promise and Pitfalls[J].North American Actuarial Journal, 2000. V4,no3,pp.71-108
10Williams, D.. Economic and Regulatory Capital Converge: Risk Systems Challenged[J].Meridian research, Inc., MA, USA,2002.