期刊文献+

文化普遍性与特定性在人格结构研究中的论争 被引量:3

The Debates between Cultural Universality and Specificity in the Research of Personality Traits
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人格结构的研究存在两种分歧:一种是以大五模型为代表的文化普遍性观点;另一种是以本土心理学为代表的文化特定性观点。本研究认为,不应该把人格文化的普遍性和特定性视为互相矛盾、彼此排斥的关系,而应承认人格既有普遍性也有文化特定性的成分。人格结构是文化普遍性和文化特定性的统一。 There are two different perspectives on personality traits:one is the cultural universality represented by Five-Factor Model and the other is the cultural specificity demonstrated in indigenous psychology. This thesis points out that there are both cultural universality and specificity in the traits of human relationship, which should not be contradicted with each other. People should admit that there is a unity of cultural universality and specificity in personality traits.
出处 《辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第6期41-43,共3页 Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金 辽宁省高等学校人文社会科学重点研究基地基金资助项目(J05041)
关键词 人格特质 大五模型 本土心理学 文化普遍性 文化特定性 personality traits Five-Factor Model of Personality indigenous psychology cultural universality cultural specificity
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Shweder R A & Sullivan M A.The Semiotic Subject of Cultural Psychology[M]//Pevin L A.Handbook of Personality:Theory and Research.New York:Guilford,1990:399-418.
  • 2McCrae R R & Costa P T Jr.Personality Trait Structure as a Human Universal[J].American Psychologist,1997,52(5):509-516.
  • 3Rolland J P.The Cross-cultural Generalizability of the Five-Fat-tor Model of Personality[M]//McCrae R R & Allik J.The FiveFactor Model of Personality across Cultures:International and Cultural Psychology Series.New York,NY,US:Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers,2002:7-28.
  • 4Gosling S D & John O P.Personality Dimensions in Non-human Animals,A Cross-species Review[J].Current Directions in Psychological Sdence,1999,8(3):69-75.
  • 5King J E & Figueredo A J.The Five-Factor Model Plus Dominance in Chimpanzee Personality[J].Journal of Research in Personality,1997,31(2):257-271.
  • 6Riemann R,Angleitner A & Strelau J.Genetic and Environmental Influences on Personality:A Study of Twins Reared together Using the Self and Peer-report NEO-FFI Scales[J].Journal of Personality,1997,65(3):449-475.
  • 7Angleitner A & Ostendorf F.The FFM:A Comparison of German Speaking Countries(Austria,former East and West Germany,and Switzerland)[C]//Contribution to the Symposium"Personality and Culture"at the 27th International Congress of Psychology.Stockholm,Sweden,2000:23-28.
  • 8Sulloway F J.Born to Rebel,Birth Order,Family Dynamics,and Creative Lives[M].London:Abacus Books,1998.
  • 9Jefferson T,Herbst J H & McCrae R R.Association between Birth Order and Personality Traits:Evidence from Self-reports and Observer Ratings[J].Journal of Research in Personality,1998,32(4):498-509.
  • 10Doi T.The Anatomy of Dependence[M].Tokyo:Kodansha,1973.

同被引文献33

  • 1张智勇,王登峰.论人格特质“大七”因素模型[J].心理科学,1997,20(1):48-51. 被引量:20
  • 2曾维希,张进辅.MBTI人格类型量表的理论研究与实践应用[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(2):255-260. 被引量:64
  • 3王惠萍.认知风格对大学生不确定条件下判断和决策的影响[J].应用心理学,2006,12(4):340-346. 被引量:8
  • 4梁竹苑,许燕,蒋奖.决策中个体差异研究现状述评[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(4):689-694. 被引量:25
  • 5Kahneman D, Tversky A. The Framing of Decisions and the Ra- tionality of Choice[J]. Science, 1981,221:453-458.
  • 6Levin I P. Why Do You and I Make Different Decisions? Tracking Individual Differences in Decision Making [J]. JDM Newsletter, 1999, XVⅢ (4) :5.
  • 7Levin I P, Schneider S L, Gaeth G J. All Frames Are Not Crea- ted Equal: a Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects [J]. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 1998,76(2) : 149-188.
  • 8Bateman C R, Fraedrich J P, Iyer R. Framing Effects within the Ethical Decision Making Process of Consumers[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2002,36(1) :119-140.
  • 9Fagley N S, Miller P M. Framing Effects and Arenas of Choices: Your Money of Your Life[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1997,71:355-373.
  • 10Wang X T. Self-framing of Risky Choice[J]. Journal of Behav- ioural Decision Making, 2004,17 : 1-16.

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部