期刊文献+

经皮介入治疗下肢动脉阻塞136例分析 被引量:4

Outcome of endovascular therapy of iliac,superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in 136 patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估下肢动脉严重狭窄患者经皮球囊成形术或选择性支架置入术的近中期临床疗效和安全性。方法连续136例下肢严重间歇性跛行或慢性缺血的患者,病因均为动脉粥样硬化,其中髂动脉阻塞81例,股浅动脉阻塞43例,腘动脉阻塞12例,所有病变首先均进行经皮球囊成形术,如果有夹层或残余狭窄>30%,则置入支架。随访1年,在6个月和12个月时评估再狭窄和临床疗效。结果共进行36例经皮球囊成形术和99例选择性支架置入术。术前病变狭窄程度70%~100%(88.6%±7.5%),狭窄长度1.5~18.0 cm[(6.2±2.9)cm],治疗节段2.0~19.0 cm[(7.3±3.2)cm],术后残余狭窄0%~30.0%(8.7%±5.1%)。手术相关的并发症2例。6个月随访发现,再狭窄率在髂动脉、股腘动脉和所有病变分别为7.3%、19.4%和12.3%,球囊成形术组和支架置入术组再狭窄率分别为17.8%比10.2%(P>0.05);12个月随访发现,再狭窄率在髂动脉、股腘动脉和所有病变分别为12.5%、29.9%和19.6%,球囊成形术组和支架置入术组再狭窄率分别为28.9%比16.1%(P>0.05)。但6 min 最大步行距离和踝肱收缩压比球囊成形术组均显著小于支架置入术组(P<0.001)。12个月随访期间发生急性心肌梗死3例和小卒中2例,无死亡病例。结论经皮介入治疗下肢动脉阻塞安全有效。中期疗效显示,选择性支架置入术组的再狭窄率与球囊成形术组相当,但6 min 最大步行距离和踝肱收缩压比优于球囊成形组。 Objective To evaluate the effect and clinical outcome of balloon angioplasty or selected stent implantation in patients with severe lower limb artery disease. Methods A total of 136 consecutive patients who had severe claudication or chronic limb ischemia due to atherosclerotic stenosis or occlusion of the iliac ( n = 81 ) , superficial femoral ( n = 43 ) and pepliteal ( n = 12 ) arteries underwent balloon angioplasty initially and selected stent implantation was followed in cases of dissection or more than 30% residual stenosis after balloon angioplasty ( n = 99 ). Restenosis and clinical outcomes were assessed at 6 months and 12 months. Results Baseline mean ( ± SD) lesion length ranged from 1.5 cm - 18. 0 cm [ (6. 2 ±2. 9) cm] and stenosis ranged from 70% - 100% (88. 6% ±7.5% ). The mean length of treated segments was 2. 0 cm - 19.0 cm [ (7.3 ±3.2) cm], and residual stenosis after procedure was 0% -30% (8.7% ±5. 1% ). There were two procedure-related thrombosis complications and patients recovered pest related treatments. At 6 months, the rates of restenosis were 7.3% in iliac lesions, 19.4% in femoropepliteal lesions and 12. 3% in all lesions, 10. 2% in the stent group and 17.8 % in the balloon angioplasty group, respectively ( P 〉 0. 05 ) and revascularization was performed in 10 patients; at 12 months, the rates of restenosis were 12. 5% in iliac lesions, 29. 9% in femoropopliteal lesions and 19. 6% in all lesions, 16. 1% in the stent group and 28.9 % in the balloon angioplasty group (P 〉 0. 05), respectively. Six-minute walk distance was significantly longer and ankle brachial index (ABI) was significantly higher at 6 months and 12 months in the stent group compared to balloon angioplasty group ( all P 〈0. 001 ). All patients are alive and 3 acute myocardial infarction and 2 minor stroke were observed during 12 months follow-up. Conclusions Endovascular therapy in the iliac, superficial femoral and popliteal artery was safe and effective. The rate of restenosis in the stent group was comparable to that in balloon angioplasty group during 12 months follow up. Stent implantation is superior to balloon angioplasty in terms of six-minute maximal walk capacity and ABI during 12 months follow up.
出处 《中华心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第11期1015-1019,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cardiology
关键词 外周血管病 血管成形术 气囊 支架 Peripheral vascular disease Angioplasty,balloon Stents
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Selvin E, Erlinger TP. Prevalence of and risk factors for peripheral arterial disease in the United States: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2000. Circulation, 2004,110 (6): 738-743.
  • 2Pastemak RC, Criqui MH, Benjamin EJ, et al. Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference: Writing Group Ⅰ: epidemiology. Circulation, 2004, 109(21) :2605-2612.
  • 3卫生部心血管病防治研究中心.外周血管病//中国心血管病报告2005.中国大百科全书出版社,2006:108-109.
  • 4Hankey GJ, Norman PE, Eikelboom JW. Medical treatment of peripheral arterial disease. JAMA ,2006,295 ( 5 ) :547-553.
  • 5Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC Ⅱ). Eur J Vase Endovase Surg, 2007,33 (Suppl) S1-S75.
  • 6Schwarten DE, Murthy Tadavarthys S, Castaneda-Zuniga WR. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty 9 Aortic, iliac, and peripheral arterial angioplasty.//Castaneda-Zuniga WR, Murthy Tadavarthys S. Interventional radiology. 2nd. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins, 1992: 378-422.
  • 7Vroegindeweij D, Vos LD, Tielbeek AV, et al. Balloon angioplasty combined with primary stenting versus balloon angioplasty alone in femoropopliteal obstructions: a comparative randomized study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 1997,20 ( 6 ) : 420-425.
  • 8Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006,47 (6) : 1239-1312.
  • 9Leung DA, Spinosa DJ, Hagspiel KD, et al. Selection of stents for treating iliae arterial occlusive disease. J Vase Interv Radiol, 2003, 14(2):137-152.
  • 10White C. Intermittent Claudication. N Engl J Med, 2007, 356 (12): 1241-1250.

二级参考文献15

  • 1蒋雄京,吴海英,明广华,王蕾礼,郑德裕,刘国仗,惠汝太,刘力生.支架置入重建血运治疗肾动脉狭窄中期临床结果[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(3):224-227. 被引量:40
  • 2Hennerici M, Klemm C, Rautenberg W. The subclavian steal phenomenon: A common vascular disorder with rare neurologic deficits. Neurology ,1988,38(5):669-673.
  • 3Staikov IN, Do DD, Remonda L et al. The site of atheromatosis in the subclavian and vertebral arteries and its implication for angioplasty. Neuroradiology, 1999,41 (7) :537-542.
  • 4Angle JF, Matsumoto AH, McGraw JK, et al. Percutaneous angioplasty and stenting of left subclavian artery stenosis in patients with left internal mammary-coronary bypass grafts:clinical experience and long-term follow-up. Vase Endovase Surg,2003,37(2) :89-97.
  • 5Gaines PA, Swarbrick MJ, Lopez AJ, et al. The endovascular management of blue finger syndrome. Eur J Endovasc Surg, 1999,17(2) :106-110.
  • 6Henry M, Amor M, Henry I, et al. Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty of the Subclavian Arteries. J Endovasc Surg, 1999, 6(1): 33-41.
  • 7De Vries JP, Jager LC, Van den Berg JC, et al. Durability of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for obstructive lesions of proximal subclavian artery: long-term results. J Vasc Surg,2005,41(1) :19-23.
  • 8Kumar K, Dorros G, Bates MC, et al. Primary stent deployment in occlusive subclavian artery disease. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn,1995, 34(4) : 281-285.
  • 9Rodriguez-Lopez JA, Werner A, Martinez R. et al. Stenting for atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the subclavian artery. Ann Vasc Surg, 1999,13 ( 3 ) :254-260.
  • 10Phipp L, Scott J, Kessel D, et al. Subclavian endovascular stents and stent grafts: cause for concern?. J Endovasc Surg, 1999,6(3) :223-226.

共引文献16

同被引文献27

引证文献4

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部