从“挤压”到“接触”——现阶段美国对朝政策调整探析被引量：3

From "Squeeze" to "Engagement"——An Analysis on the Current Adjustment of US DPRK Policy

下载PDF

导出

摘要对朝政策一直是美国几十年来苦心经营的东北亚地区同盟体系中的弱点和盲点。正是受累于此,美国在该地区的利益自20世纪90年代以来一再受到挑战和威胁,而朝鲜也最终于2006年10月进行了首次核试验。作为应对之道,美国一改十几年来摇摆不定的对朝政策,由挤压调整为接触,推动了《共同文件》的出台和初步履行,并促成美朝首次双边会谈的实现和两国关系的逐步发展,东北亚地区安全环境的改善由此重现一线曙光。本文从现阶段朝鲜核问题的重大进展入手,分析了美国对朝政策调整的原因、实质以及前景,从另一个角度探讨了朝鲜核问题的解决过程。 The US DPRK policy is a blind spot in the whole of the US East Asia alliance network,for which it has been working on for decades.As a result of this weakness,US interests in this region have been threatened since the 1990s,resulting in DPRK is conducting of its first nuclear test in October,2006.In order to address this challenge,the U.S.changed its policy from squeezing the DPRK's international living space to direct engagemont with DPRK,leading to the formulation and step-by-step enforcement of '2.13 Joint Document',the first bilateral direct talks and the gradual progress of the bilateral relationship between the U.S.and DPRK,bringing new hopes for the security situation in Northeast Asia.This article aims at analyzing the reasons,nature and future of the present adjustment of US DPRK policy,and tries to explore the resolution process of the DPRK nuclear issue from a new perspective.

作者刘阿明

机构地区上海社会科学院亚洲太平洋研究所

出处《国际论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第6期1-6,共6页 International Forum

关键词朝鲜核问题美国对朝政策接触

分类号 D51 [政治法律—国际政治]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献22

1David S. Cloud and Jay Solomon, “North Korea Says It ls Developing Nuclear Weapons“, The Wall Street Journal, October 17, 2002.
2Joel S. Wit, “Enhancing U.S. Engagement with North Korea“, The Washington Quarterly, Spring 2007, p. 56.
3Arnold Kanter, “North Korea Missiles Launchcs and Implications for U. S. Policy“, PacNet, No. 35A, July 21, 2006, http: / / www. csis. org/media/csis/pubs/pac0635a. pdf.
4Andrew Grottoo, “Pragmatism Trumps Ideology on North Korea“, The Washington Post, February 23, 2007.
5Bob Woodward, Bush At War, New York: Simon and Schuster, 2002, p. 340; Glenn Kessler, “Chency Wiclds Power With Few Fingerprints“, The Washington Post, October 5, 2004.
6Michael O'Hanlon and Mike Mochizuki, “Prccmption and North Korea“, The Washington Times.Iunc 28, 2006.
7Thomas L. Freidman, “A Choice for the Rogue“, The New York Times, August 2, 2006.
8Henry Kissinger, “The Next Steps with lran: Negotiations Must Go Beyond Nuclear Threat to Broader Issues“, The Washingto, Post, July 31, 2006.
9Don Oberdorfer, “So Far, So Fast: What's Really Behind The Bush Administration's Course Reversal On North KoreaAnd Can The Negotiations Succeed?“ Newsweete, March 14, 2OO7.
10“Bush's Bipolar Disordcr and the Looming Failure of Multilateral Talks With North Korea“, http://www. armscontrol. org/act/2003_10/Hayes_10. asp.