期刊文献+

中国股票市场对上市公司违规行为有治理效应吗? 被引量:1

Has the Chinese Stock Market Effectively Governed the Listed Company's Contrary Behavior?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国股票市场对上市公司的违规行为是否进行了有效治理,上市公司投资者是否对上市公司发生的违规行为给予了惩罚。研究结果表明。股票市场并未对上市公司的违规行为进行惩罚,通过股票市场产生的外部治理机制失效。因此.除了以更科学、合理的制度安排等事前契约来规范主体行为外,客观上还必须要有更具指导性的行为准则——公司治理的伦理道德体系。 Whether the Chinese stock market has effectively governed the listed company's contrary behavior, whether the listed investors has given the penalty to the listed company owning to its contrary behavior. The research showed that the stock market hasn't carries on the penalty to be listed company's contrary behavior yet. Exterior government mechanism formed through the stock market becomes invalid. Therefore, apart from havior by the means of more scientific, reasonable system arrangement, it is essential the guidance objectively -- the theory morality system for the company management. standardizing the main body be- to have the behavior criterion as
作者 薛有志 周杰
机构地区 南开大学商学院
出处 《税务与经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第6期6-11,共6页 Taxation and Economy
关键词 违规行为 治理效应 股票市场 伦理 contrary behavior government effect stock market ethics
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1[英]冯·哈耶克.个人主义与经济秩序[M].贾湛,等,译,上海:上海三联书店,2003.
  • 2唐炜,李慧君.古代儒家思想与现代公司治理[J].华东交通大学学报,2003,20(6):16-20. 被引量:2
  • 3张世云,薛有志.欧盟公司治理:经验借鉴与中国实践[M].天津:天津大学出版社,2006.
  • 4Shleifer,A.and R.W.Vishny.A Survey of Corporate Governance[J].Journal of Finance,1997,(52).
  • 5Camenisch,P.F.On Monopoly in Business Ethics:Can Philosophy Do It All?[J].Journal of Business Ethics,1986,(5).
  • 6Stead,W.E.et al.An Integrative Model for Understanding and Managing Ethical Behavior in Organization[J].Journal of Business Ethics,1990,(9).
  • 7Premeaux,S.R.and R.W.Mondy.Linking Management Behavior to Ethical Philosophy[J].Journal of Business Ethics,1993,(12).
  • 8Zhang Shiyun,Zhou Jie and Xue Youzhi.“Corporate Governance Ethics:Concept,Connotation,and How It Works?”[R].proceedings of Euro-Asia Symposium on Environment and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)-From Rhetoric to Practice,Hong Kong,November,2006.
  • 9Cox,P.et al.An Empirical Examination of Institutional Investor Preferences for Corporate Social Performance[J].Journal of Business Ethics 2004,(52).
  • 10Graves,S.B.and S.A.Waddock.Institutional Owners and Social Performance[J].Academy of Management Journal,1994,(37).

二级参考文献3

  • 1罗国杰.中国古代儒家思想与政治统治[J].江西内参,1998,(5).
  • 2刘希宋 张德明.公司法人治理中的伦理道德原则[A]..2002全球金融年会论文集[C].,..
  • 3李心合.儒家伦理与现代企业理财[J].会计研究,2001(6):26-32. 被引量:31

共引文献1

同被引文献17

  • 1张应杭;黄寅.企业伦理:理论与实践,2001.
  • 2Stajkovic,A.D;F.Luthans.Business Ethics Across Cultures:A Social Cognitive Model,1997(32).
  • 3Donald,L M;L K.Trevino;D.K.Butterfield.The Influence of Collegiate and Corporate Codes of Conduct on Ethics-Related Behavior in the Workplace,1996(06).
  • 4Nash,Laura.Good Intentions Aside:A Manager's Guide to Resolving Ethical Problems,1990.
  • 5陈荣耀.企业伦理:一种价值理念的创新,2006.
  • 6胡汝银.公司治理:理论、原则与实践,2006.
  • 7国内首支SRI产品兴业社会责任投资基金获批,2005.
  • 8社会责任投资:中国基金业的新目标,2008.
  • 9中国社会责任投资China SRI,2008.
  • 10Langlois,C.C;B.B.Schlegelmilch.Do Corporate Codes of Ethics Reflect National Character?Evidence from Europe and the United States,1990(04).

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部