期刊文献+

蛛网膜下腔加双管法硬膜外联合阻滞对产程及分娩方式的影响 被引量:1

Influence of Intrathecal Fentanyl Combined with Double Catheter Epidural Analgesia on the Progress of Labor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究联合阻滞加双管法硬膜外分娩镇痛对产妇产程、分娩方式和婴儿的影响。方法选择156例单胎、足月临产初产妇为镇痛组,行蛛网膜下腔复合双管法硬膜外镇痛。未使用镇痛的154例产妇为对照组。比较两组产妇产程时间、分娩方式、新生儿Apgar评分。结果与对照组比较,镇痛组产程时间和器械助产率无显著差异(P>0.05);剖宫产率降低,催产素使用增加(P<0.05)。结论蛛网膜下腔加双管法硬膜外联合阻滞用于分娩镇痛对产妇产程无明显影响,不增加器械助产率,减少剖宫产率,对新生儿评分无明显影响。 Objective We investigated the influence of combined spinaldouble catheter labor epidural (CSEA) technique on birth progress because of the controversy about this issue.Methods One hundred fifty six health primiparas, who wished obstetric analgesia, received intrathecal fentanyl 25 p.g combined with double catheter epidural analgesia (CSEA). Control group included 154 cases without any analgesia. Results The duration of the first stage, the second stage and third stage in the CSEA [ (506 ± 182)min, (64 ±32)min and ( 12 ± 6)mini group did not present significantly different compared with the control group [(478 ± 210)mln, (57 ±23)mln and (11 ± 8)min]( P 〉 0.05). The rate of using ocytocin was higher in group CSEA than in group contro ( P 〈 0.05). There was no difference on rate of instrumental delivery and Apgar score between two groups. The rate of caesarean section in CSEA (12.18%) group was significantly lower than in control (25.32%) group ( P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Combined spinal - double catheter epidural (CSEA) analgesia did not affect birth progress and rate of instrttmental delivery significantly. CSEA can significandy decrease the rate of caesarean section.
作者 丛勇滋
机构地区 大连市中心医院
出处 《黑龙江医学》 2007年第11期826-828,共3页 Heilongjiang Medical Journal
关键词 无痛分娩 镇痛 硬膜外 镇痛 蛛网膜下腔 Analgesia obstetrical Analgesia epidural analgesia intrathecal
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献39

  • 1陈新忠,陈宏,石一复.腰麻-硬膜外联合阻滞分娩镇痛对母儿血一氧化氮的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2004,24(5):387-388. 被引量:19
  • 2Fogel ST,Shyken JM,Leighton BL,et al.Epidural labor analgesia and the incidence of cesarean delivery for dystocia.Anesth Analg,1998,87:119-123.
  • 3Halpern SH,Muir H,Terrance W,et al.A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing patient-controlled epidural with intravenous analgesia for pain relief in labor.Anesth Analg,2004,99:1532-1538.
  • 4Sharma SK,Sidawi JE,Ramin SM,et al.Cesarean delivery: a randomized trial of epidural versus patient-controlled meperidine analgesia during labor.Anesthesiology,1997,87:487-494.
  • 5Sharma SK,Alexander JM,Messick G,et al.Cesarean delivery: a randomized trial of epidural analgesia versus intravenous meperidine analgesia during labor in nulliparous women.Anesthesiology,2002,96:546-551.
  • 6Sharma SK,Donald DD,Wiley JR,et al.Labor analgesia and cesarean delivery an individual patient meta-analysis of nulliparous women .Anesthesiology,2004,100:142-148.
  • 7Lieberman E,O'donoghue C.Unintended effects of epidural analgesia during labor: a systematic review.Am J Obstet Gynecol,2002,186 (5 Suppl Nature):S31-68.
  • 8Lieberman E,Lang JM,Frigoletto FJ,et al.Epidural analgesia,intrapartum fever,and neonatal sepsis evaluation.Pediatrics,1997,99:415-419.
  • 9Philip J,Alexander JM,Sharma SK,et al.Epidural analgesia during labour and maternal fever.Anesthesiology,1999,90:1271-1275.
  • 10Goetzl L,Cohen A,Frigoletto FJ,et al.Maternal epidural use and neonatal sepsis evaluation in afebrile mothers.Pediatrics,2001,108:1099-1102.

共引文献152

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部