期刊文献+

传统、旅行的人类学与中国的现代性话语 被引量:8

Tradition, Traveling Theory, Anthropology and the Discourse of Modernity in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对温州农村乡村经济在私有化和工业化过程中的复兴,以及当地传统社团组织、民间宗教、传统习俗、仪式和节日庆典的复兴和重建进行研究,文章以所谓“传统”的命运以及人类学知识和国家范围内的现代性话语在现代国家的构建中所扮演的角色为出发点,研究了国家话语和地方传统之间的互动关系。现代性孕育出了与其自身对抗的力量。在温州,随着经济的发展,“传统”力量得到了增强,经济的私有化更多地促进了当地人对重建地方上的基础设施和传统文化的积极参与。中国的现代性话语及其后果特征有三:首先朝代更替的历史为一种线性的历史进化论所代替;其次,中国的现代性话语实践是以西方为衡量标准——西方被认为是先进的,中国是落后的;第三,在对传统的态度上,中国比西方表现出更为激进的行动,导致传统链条的断裂,中国年轻一代失去社会记忆力。 Through a case study of Wenzhou on the revival of local village economy in the process of national privatization and industrialization, and on the reconstruction of local traditional societies, folk religions, local customs, rituals and festivities, the thesis explores the interactive relationships between the state discourses and local traditions by looking into the mishap of "tradition" and the role played by anthropological knowledge and state discourse of modernity in the construction of a modern state. Modernity gives birth to the forces against itself. In Wenzhou, the power of tradition is strengthened along with the development of economy, as economic privatization gives rise to more active involvement in the reconstruction of local infrastructure and culture by local people. Chinese modern discourse and its outcome have three characteristics: first, a spiral history of alternating dynasties is replaced by a linear history of evolution; second, Chinese modern discourse makes the West its criteria: the West is thought the advanced, and China the backward; third, facing its own tradition, China appears more progressive than the West, which brings about the rupture between now and the past and the amnesia of the younger generation.
出处 《中国农业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第2期30-42,共13页 Journal of China Agricultural University;Social Sciences
关键词 温州 传统 现代性 国家 民间宗教 Wenzhou Tradition Modernity Nation Folk religion
  • 相关文献

参考文献44

  • 1[1]阿城文化制约着人[N].文艺报,1985-07-06(2).
  • 2韩少功.文学的根[J].作家,1984,(4).
  • 3[8]施叔青.鸟的传人:与湖南作家韩少功对谈[M]∥文坛反思与前瞻.新加坡:明创出版社,1989:124-140.
  • 4[9]童恩正.摩尔根的模式与中国的原始社会研究[M]∥文化人类学.上海:上海人民出版社,1989.
  • 5伍晓明.20世纪中国文化在西方面前的自我意识[J].二十一世纪,1992,(14):102-112.
  • 6[12]Anagnost,Ann Politics and magic in contemporary China[J].Modern China,1987,13(1):40-61.
  • 7[13]Aragnost,Ann.Constructions of civility in the age of flexible accumulation[R].Unpublished paper given at the American Anthropological Association meetings,San Francisco,1992.
  • 8[14]Berman,Marshall.All That is Solid Melts into Air:The Experience of Modernity[M].New York:Penguin,1982.
  • 9[15]Bloch,Maurice.Marxism and Anthropology:The History of a Relationship[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,1983.
  • 10[16]Chang,Kwang-Chih (张光直).Art,Myth,and Ritual:the Path to Political Authority in Ancient China[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1983.

同被引文献120

引证文献8

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部