期刊文献+

论专利实质性授权标准的完善——以我国《专利法》第22条为视角 被引量:2

On the Perfection of Patentability:From the Perspective of Article 22 of Patent Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 技术创新能力已成为衡量一个国家科技和经济实力的主要指标,专利的质量是企业经济生命的灵魂和源泉。然而,我国现行的专利实质性授权标准不利于鼓励真正的发明创造,对经济的发展必将产生负面影响。应该采用绝对新颖性标准,同时完善创造性的客观判断标准,为我国专利制度的稳健发展构建理性的法律平台。 Technological innovation has become a major norm which determines a nation's scientific, technological and economic capacity. The quality is the core and resource for the life of an enterprise. Nevertheless, Chinese present patentability is not beneficial to encourage genuine innovations, which shall bring about negative effects to economic development. We should adopt absolute criterion for novelty, and at the same time, perfect the objective judging standard for creativity, so as to establish a rational legal platform for the steady development of patent system.
出处 《韶关学院学报》 2007年第11期88-91,共4页 Journal of Shaoguan University
关键词 专利 发明 实用新型 新颖性 创造性 patent invention utility model novelty creativity
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1European Patent Convention, 1973年签署,1978年生效.
  • 2"Flash of creative genius". See Honorable Giles S. Rich, Laying the Ghost of the "Invention" Requirement, in Foundations of Intellectual Property (Foundation Press 2004) (Robert P. Merges, Jane C. Ginsburg), 93.
  • 3Graham v. John Deere,383 U.S. 1.
  • 4David F. Noble, The Corporation as Inventor, Patent-Law Reform and Patent Monopoly,in Foundations of Intellectual Property ( Foundation Press 2004) (Robert P. Merges, Jane C. Ginsburg), 41.
  • 5Edmund W. Kitch, Graham v. John Deere Co. : New Standards for Patents, in Foundations of Intellectual Property ( Foundation Press 2004) ( Robert P. Merges, Jane C. Ginsburg, ed. ), 102.
  • 6American Law Institute: Restatement of the Law, Torts (Second), Pamphlet 2, West Group (1965), 12 -13.
  • 7U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) ,Manual of Patent Examining Procedure,8th ed. (2001).
  • 8Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office, Part C, Chapter iv 9.8.
  • 9Federal Trade Commission of USA, To Promote Innovation : the Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy, ( October 2003 ),Chapter 4. http ://www. tic. gov,2007年1月613最后访问.
  • 10Http://www.ipo.org网站.

共引文献21

同被引文献27

  • 1张平.商业方法软件专利保护:美国的实践及其启示[J].法商研究,2005,22(4):138-145. 被引量:32
  • 2冯晓青.专利权的扩张及其缘由探析[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2006,20(5):130-138. 被引量:14
  • 3吴汉东.知识产权本质的多维度解读[J].中国法学,2006(5):97-106. 被引量:151
  • 4[美]劳伦斯·莱斯格.思想的未来[M].李旭,译.北京:中信出版社,2004.
  • 5Hotel Security Checking Co. v. Lorraine Co. [ R], 160 F. 467 (2d Cir. 1908).
  • 6State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.[R], 149F. 3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
  • 7In Re Bilski[R], 545 V. 3d 943 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
  • 8Bilski v. Kappos[ R], 130 S. Ct. 3218(2010).
  • 9张平.论商业方法软件的可专利性一特别分析美日欧在BMP上的立场和价值取向以及中国的应对策略[A]//网络法律评论[M].北京:法律出版社,2002.
  • 10Bagby, J. W. Business Method Proliferation : Convergence of Transactional Analytics and Technical Scientifics [ J]. BUS. LAW. , 2000, 56: 423.

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部