期刊文献+

中国上市公司并购的价值效应的EVA分析 被引量:10

On the Value M & A of China's Listed Company:EVA Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国上市公司的并购交易总体上来看无助于企业价值的提高,相反,大部分收购公司在并购交易中遭遇价值损毁,其主要原因在于并购交易未能提高业务收入、降低经营成本,在提高资本利用效率方面的表现也差强人意。这表明,在我国的并购交易中未见协同效应,并购交易的动机和交易对象需要校正和调整。 The value of acquiring firms was not raised but destroyed by M&A in China, the cause which was that M&A had neither increased business income, lowered business cost, nor improved e efficiency of capital-use. It is illustrated that there appears no coordination effect in China's M & A, and that motivation and transaction counterpart of M&A should be adjusted.
作者 张方方
机构地区 暨南大学金融系
出处 《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2007年第6期895-900,共6页 Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
关键词 并购 企业价值 EVA EVA比率 M&A value of firm EVA EVA rate tree
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献17

  • 1李瑾.我国证券市场的交易成本与市场效率[J].农村金融研究,2002,0(7):17-19. 被引量:1
  • 2张先治.EVA指标计算的探讨[J].统计研究,1995,12(1):32-34. 被引量:16
  • 3.深圳证券交易所综合研究所研究报告[R].,1999.405—425.
  • 4[1]Asquith,P.(1983), "Merge Bids,Uncertainty,and Stockholder Returns",Journal of Financial Economics.
  • 5[2]Brown,S.and J.Warner(1985), "Using Daily Stock Returns,the case of Event Studies",Journal of Financial Economics,8:205-258.
  • 6[3]Jarrell,G.and A.Pouhen,1987,"Shark Repellents and Stock Prices:The Effects of Antitakeover Amendments Since 1980" ,Journal of Financial Economics,18:127-168.
  • 7[4]Jensen,M.and W.Meckling(1976), "Theory of the Firm:Managerial Behavior,Agency Cost and Ownership Structure",Journal of Financial Economics,3:305-360.
  • 8[5]Mueller,D.(1969),"A Theory of Conglomerate Mergers",Quarterly Journal of Economics.
  • 9[6]Roll,M.(1986), "The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers",Journal of Business,59.
  • 10[7]Shleifer,A.and R.vishny(1986), "Large Shareholders and Corporate Control",Journal of Political Economy,94:31.

同被引文献124

引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部