摘要
与宋词研究相比,20世纪百年来金词研究的总体格局是相当冷寂的,其基本态势呈现为首尾热、中间冷的"倒马鞍"形:在30年代至40年代形成一个相对的高峰后,随即迅速下滑(50—70年代末),直至世纪末的后10年(90年代延伸至2001年)由于多部高水平专著和不少有分量专题论文的出现方形成另一个相对的高峰期。与宋词的整体研究相比,20世纪金词研究表现出极大的不平衡性,同时,一些重大问题如金词地位衡估、金词分期等尚未达成学术共识。要准确衡估金词的历史地位,就必须对20世纪确立和流行的两个观念前提——进化论文学史观下的"文体代变、代胜观"和"元曲代宋词而兴观"予以反思。除却地位衡估、分期这些重大问题之外,金词研究中有待深入的具体领域尚多。
In comparison with the research of Song Ci since of Jin Ci is pretty silent which formed an inverted saddle ,i.e.the the turn of the 20th century, the overall research beginning and the latest years are hot while the years in the middle are silent.It chilled off all of a sudden after its prosperity never reach another climax until the last decade of the 20th century,in which graphs during the 1930s and 40s and it period a good number of monoand thesis at a high academic level came to the field of research.In contrast with the overall study of Song Ci,the research of Jin Ci in the 20th century is not balanced, while some of the key topics like the assessing of the status of Jin Ci and the diversion of period of Jin Ci still remain undetermined.It is obvious that an introspect into the theory of periodical booming of genre and the theory of replacement of Song Ci by Yuan Qu which formed into shape under the pretext of the evolution of literature set up and prevailed in the 20th century is necessary,in order to make an accurate assessment of the historical status of Jin Ci.Furthermore,many fields still await a deep digest besides the topics mentioned above.
出处
《南阳师范学院学报》
CAS
2007年第7期25-30,36,共7页
Journal of Nanyang Normal University
基金
吉林大学人文社会科学研究基金项目"金词研究"(2001XX011)
关键词
金词
研究史
代变代胜文学史观
词曲递变
Jin Ci
history of research
theory of periodical booming of genre
replacement of Ci by Qu