摘要
“意在笔先”最初是对书画理论的见解,后代文论家把这一见解推而广之,使其成为中国古代文论的重要命题、且倍受后人推崇。本文把“意在笔先”同一些质疑的观点“意随笔生”、“情在笔先”进行了辨证的比较。从而说明“意在笔先”不是一个固定的、一成不变的模式。我们需要用辨证的眼光去审视它。
"Work out the plot before putting pen to papers" initial be the view to painting and calligraphy theory, Descendant is tattooed with in torms of with this one view applying broadly, Make the person becose the important proposition that Chinese culture the ancient times comments on, At present be doubly descendants praised highly. The viewpoint "intention informal essay the main body of a book", is questioned with "working out the plot before putting pen to papers" with a few has grown "feeling has carried out the comparison discriminating in i'irst', Explain that "working out the plot before putting pen to papers" is not a fixed, changeless pattern thereby. We need to use the sight discriminatiag to go to scan it.
出处
《和田师范专科学校学报》
2007年第4期74-75,共2页
Journal of Hotan Normal College
关键词
意在笔先
意随笔生
情在笔先
Work out the plot before putting pen to papers
intention informal essay the main body of a book: feeling has carried out the comparison discriminating in first