期刊文献+

工作记忆中转换加工的内源性准备和外源性调节 被引量:9

The Endogenous Preparation and Exogenous Adjustment of Switching Process in Working Memory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 考察工作记忆中转换加工的控制过程。采用"任务转换"范式,探究预知条件(实验一)和未预知条件(实验二)下的转换加工。结果发现:(1)任务重复与任务转换是两个不同的过程;无论是在预知条件还是未预知条件下都出现任务重复效应显著大于任务转换效应;(2)验证了转换加工包括内源性准备和外源性调节两个不同的加工过程,内源性准备只是任务设置重建的一部分;(3)对先后呈现的两个任务(任务1—任务2:任务重复或任务转换)在预知重复、预知转换和未预知条件下,任务2对任务1的影响不同,存在前瞻性记忆效应。由此推断转换加工的心理过程是:在预知情况下,任务1呈现后即启动内源性准备,直到任务2呈现时,通过外源性调节最终完成任务转换;而在未预知情况下,只能依赖外源性调节来实现。 Switching process is an important aspect of executive control. The process is presented as controlling switching course between two tasks which compete the same cognitive resources in working memory. The course of switching involves both endogenous preparation without an external stimulus and exogenous adjustment in response to the external stimulus.But what is the general way to deal with information is not clear. A "Task - switch" paradigm was used in this study to investigate the switching process in behavioral experiments. Tasks consisted of a simple classification of Chinese words (noun/verb) or digits (odd/even). For each task, a stimulus picture consisted of a background, one - word Chinese and a two - digit natural number. The task to be performed was indicated by the color of the background(If the color is red, the task is a digit task, and if it is blue, the task is a Chinese - word task). We explored the switching process under foreknowledge conditions in experiment 1. Participants performed two tasks consecutively(task one and task two) that were either the same (task repetition) or different(task switch), and there were three blocks for both task repetition and task switch. All the blocks were presented bythe sequence of ABBAAB. In experiment 2, we studied the switching process under no - foreknowledge condition. There were six blocks of stimulus and each block mixed with the trials of task repetition and the trials of task switch randomly. All the blocks were presented in a quasi- random sequence. The presentation (version 0.81) was used to compile the experimental procedures and the 17 inches (1024 x 768) Dell monitor was used to display stimuli. Thirty healthy and right - handed undergraduate students(12 men and 18 women) from the Capital Normal University participated in the experiments 1 and 2 respectively. The students' eyesight or corrected eyesight was normal, and their ages ranged from 19 -24 years (averaged: 20.03). A repeated measure ANOVA was performed to analyze the data. The results suggested: 1 .The task repetition and task switch were different courses. The time of task repetition effect was significantly longer than that of task switch effect, under the condition of foreknowledge or no - foreknowledge; 2. The hypothesis was confLrmed that endogenous preparation and exogenous adjustment were two different courses of switch process; 3. Underthe conditions of foreknowledge task repetition, foreknowledge task switch and no - foreknowledge, the influence of task two on task one was different. There was a prosoective memory effect in this dealing. Comparing the results of experiments land 2, we conclude that the general way of the switching process in dealing with information as an important aspect of executive controlis that under the condition of foreknowledge, switching process beginning with endogenous preparation after task one is clear, and is accomplished via exogenous adjustment after task two is presented. In the case of no - foreknowledge, however, switching process can be accomplished only by relying on the exogenous adjustment.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2007年第6期985-993,共9页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30170322 30570603) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20040028001)项目 北京市重点<学习与认知>实验室资助 北京市属市管高校人才强教计划项目资助
关键词 转换加工 转换代价 内源性准备 外源性调节 前瞻性记忆效应 switching process, switching cost, endogenous preparation, exogenous adjustment, prospective memory effect.
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1ColletteF, LindenM V. Brain imaging of the central executive component of working memory. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2002, 26:105 - 125
  • 2Norman D A, Shallice T. Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behavior. In: Davidson R J,Schwartz G E, Shapiro D, editors. Consciousness and self regulation. Advances in research and theory, New York: Plenum Press, 1986. 1 - 18
  • 3Baddeley A D, Hitch G. Working memory. In: Bower G Aed. The psychology of learning and motivation (vol.8). New York: Academic Press, 1974.47 - 89
  • 4Jersild A T, Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology (Whole No. 89), 1927
  • 5Biederman I. Human performance in contingent information processing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology :General, 1972, 93:219 -238
  • 6Allport D A, Styles E A, Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. Attention and performance, XV: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing, MIT Press, 1994. 421 -452
  • 7Dark V. Switching between memory and perception: Moving attention or moving memory retrieval. Memory and Cognition, 1990, 18:119 -127
  • 8Rogers R D, Monsell S. Costsof a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1995, 124:207 - 231
  • 9Meiran N. Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1996, 22:1423 -1442
  • 10Rubinstein J S, Meyer D E, Evans J E. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human, Perception and Performance, 2001,27:763 - 797

共引文献8

同被引文献111

  • 1周晓林.执行控制:一个具有广阔理论前途和应用前景的研究领域[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(5):641-642. 被引量:90
  • 2史艺荃,周晓林.执行控制研究的重要范式——任务切换[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(5):672-679. 被引量:22
  • 3邱江,罗跃嘉,吴真真,张庆林.再探猜谜作业中“顿悟”的ERP效应[J].心理学报,2006,38(4):507-514. 被引量:33
  • 4Allport, A. , Wylie, G. (2000). Task switching, stimulusresponse bindings and negative priming. In S. MonseU, J. Driver (Eds.): Attention and performance X Ⅷ: Control of cognitive processes (pp.35-70), MIT Press.
  • 5Altmann, E. M. , Gray, W. D. (2008) . An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Review, 115,602-639.
  • 6Ahmann, E. M. (2004). The preparation effect in task switching: carryover of SOA. Memory & Cognition, 32, 153-163.
  • 7Hsieh, S. (2002). Twocomponent processes in switching attention: a study of eventrelated potentials. Perceptual and motor skills, 94, 1168-1176.
  • 8Hsieh, S. (2006). The lateralized readiness potential and P300 of stimulusset switching. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60,284-291.
  • 9Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of psychology. 89, 5-82.
  • 10Koch, I. , & Allport, A. (2006). Cuebased preparation and stimulusbased priming of tasks in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 34,433-444.

引证文献9

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部