期刊文献+

公司经营困境风险的动态评价模型研究 被引量:3

Dynamic Model for Evaluating Corporate Business Distress Risk
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以医药制造业上市公司为例,在一个特定的行业背景下,采用非配对取样方式,应用Log istic离散时间风险模型,对公司经营困境风险进行了动态评价。结果显示,股票的S igm a系数值、股权集中度、公司规模及资产负债率与经营困境风险显著相关。评价中发现,为了达到一个较好且合适的分类识别正确率,决策者必须在型Ⅰ类错误成本与型Ⅱ类错误成本之间进行权衡。此外,在行业内选取了经营困境公司与经营健康公司作为2个对照组,发现2组公司的经营困境风险动态演化过程存在明显差异,这种可视化演示方法对经营困境发生的危险时段有预测作用。 Taking the medicine manufacturing industry as an example and using non-paired sam- ple, the corporate financial distress was evaluated dynamically by Logistic discrete time hazard model. The results show Sigma of company's stock returns, ownership concentration, company's size and as- sets-liabilities ratio are significantly related to financial distress risk. It is seen that in order to achieve a high and appropriate correct classification rate, the cutoff should be selected by trading off type I error cost and the type Ⅱ error cost. By comparing the distressed company group with the healthy company group, it is found that there exit significant difference in the dynamic behavior of survival rate and hazard rate. This video demonstrating method can be used to predict “the likely time to distress”.
出处 《管理学报》 2007年第6期767-773,802,共8页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 福建省青年人才资助项目(2007F3046) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70702022)
关键词 经营困境 动态评价 Logistic离散时间风险模型 business distress dynamic evaluation logistic discrete time hazard model
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

二级参考文献60

  • 1黄小原,肖四汉.神经网络预警系统[J].预测,1995,14(2):63-66. 被引量:19
  • 2Balcaen S,Ooghe H. 35 years of studies on business failure:an overview of the classical methodologies and their related problems(2004/248) [R]. Belgium : Ghent University, 2004 : 1- 56.
  • 3Shumway T. Forecasting bankruptcy more accurately:a simple hazard model[J]. Journal of Business, 2001, 74(1):101-124.
  • 4Luoma M,Laitinen E K. Survival analysis as a tool for company failure prediction[J]. Omega International Journalof Management Science, 1991, 19 (6): 673-678.
  • 5Laitinen E K. Financial predictors for different phases of the failure process[J]. Omega The International Journal of Management Science, 1993, 21(2): 215-228.
  • 6Laitinen T,Kankaanpaeae M. Comparative analysis of failure prediction methods: the Finnish case[J]. The European Accounting Review, 1999,8(1): 67-92.
  • 7Spanos M, Dounias G, Matsatsinis N, Zopoudinis C. A fuzzy knowledge-based decision aiding method for the assessment of financial risk: the case of corporate bankruptcy prediction [R]. European Symposium on Intelligent Techniques(ESIT) ,Orthodox Academy of Crete, Greece, 1999: 1-7.
  • 8Slowinski R, Zopudinis C. Application of the rough ,set approach to evaluation of bankruptcy risk[J]. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 1995, 4: 27-41.
  • 9Daubie M,Levecq Ph. , Meskens N. A comparison of the rough sets and recursive partitioning induction approach :an application to commercial loans[J]. International Transactions in Operational Research, 2002,9 : 681- 694.
  • 10Scapens R W,Ryan R J,Flecher L. Explaining corporate failure:a catastrophe theory approach [J]. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 1981, 8(1) :1-26.

共引文献133

同被引文献54

引证文献3

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部