期刊文献+

新目的论与心智的终极解释 被引量:4

Neo-teleology and the Ultimate Interpretation of Mind
原文传递
导出
摘要 With the development of Naturalism and the "biological turning", Teleology has been revived as a metaphysical theory and the base of naturalization in the Western contemporary philosophy. Teleology has evolved into a thorough Neo-teleology: Purpose is no longer viewed as the universal ultimate cause of everything, but only a property which evolves together with and belongs to the organism; it only applies to biological phenomenon. Neo-teleology has also developed systemic theories about the form, the kind, the substance, the occurring and developing process, the base of actualization and the effect of purpose. It is also an indispensable interpretive means which will supply the deficiencies of causal-functional interpretation of science. With the development of Naturalism and the 'biological turning', Teleology has been revived as a metaphysical theory and the base of naturalization in the Western contemporary philosophy. Teleology has evolved into a thorough Neo-teleology: Purpose is no longer viewed as the universal ultimate cause of everything, but only a property which evolves together with and belongs to the organism; it only applies to biological phenomenon. Neo-teleology has also developed systemic theories about the form, the kind, the substance, the occurring and developing process, the base of actualization and the effect of purpose. It is also an indispensable interpretive means which will supply the deficiencies of causal-functional interpretation of science.
作者 高新民 殷筱
出处 《哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第11期54-62,共9页 Philosophical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1迈尔,1990年.《生物学思想的发展》,刘珺珺等译,湖南教育出版社.
  • 2Bogdan, R. , 1994, Grounds for Cognition, New Jersey:Lawrence Erbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers.
  • 3Bogdan, R. , 1997, Interpreting Mind, Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
  • 4Bogdan, R. , 2000, Minding Mind, Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
  • 5Lycan, W.G. ( ed. ), 1900, Mind and Cognition : A Reader, Massachusetts : Basil Blackwell.
  • 6McGinn, C. , 1989, Mental Content, Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
  • 7Millikan, R. , 1984, Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories, Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
  • 8Papineau, D. , 1993, Philosophical Naturalism, Oxford : Basil Blackwell.

同被引文献29

  • 1高新民,赵泽林.“生物学转向”与新目的论[J].哲学动态,2006(5):41-45. 被引量:6
  • 2D Hull. Philosophy of Biology[J]. Philosophy of Science: Volume 2. The Hague: Nijhoff,298.
  • 3[美]恩斯特·迈尔.生物学思想发展的历史[M].涂长晟等译.四川教育出版社,1990.
  • 4[丹麦]玻尔·尼耳斯.玻尔哲学文选[M].戈革译.北京:商务印书馆,1999.
  • 5[美]恩斯特·迈尔.生物学哲学[M].涂长晟等译.沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1992.
  • 6R J Bogdan. Grounds for Cognition[M]. New Jersey: Lawrence Erbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers, 1994.
  • 7D Papineau. Philosophical Naturalism [M]. Oxford: Basil- Blackwell, 1993 :45.
  • 8D Hull. Philosophy of Biological Science[M]. Prenticehall: Englewood Cliffs NJ, 1974 : 113- 115.
  • 9R J Bogdan. Interpreting Mind[M]. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1997 : 265.
  • 10W C Wimsatt. Teleology and the Logical Structure of Function Statements[J]. Stud. Hist. Phil,Sci, 1972(3):1-80.

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部