摘要
我国民事反诉制度规定在1991年公布实施的《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》中。由于理论研究的不足以及受到宜粗不宜细的立法指导思想的影响,《民事诉讼法》对反诉制度仅作了简单的规定。我国现行立法虽然确立了反诉制度,但是现行法律并没有对反诉制度作出系统的,科学的,具有操作性的规定,反映出了我国现行民事反诉制度存在的诸多缺陷,这些缺陷主要是由于我国理论界对反诉制度的研究不足,特别是对反诉概念的界定不当造成的。因此,对我国理论界关于反诉概念进行反思,从而正确界定反诉概念,对于完善我国民事反诉制度具有重要意义。
China's counterclaim institution has China ( 1991 ). Influenced by legislative principles as the insufficient theoretical research institution. China's current legislation been prescribed in Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of of the concept that legislation should be better generalized, as well on it, the Civil Procedure Law just offered the basic guidelines for counterclaim has established counterclaim institution; however, insufficient theoretical research, especially the improper defining of the concept of counterclaim makes the prescription of counterclaim institution hard to be scientific, systematic enough or manipulate. This reflects many defects in china's current counterclaim institution. Therefore, reconsideration on counterclaim institution with an eye to defining it correctly means much to the consummation of China's counterclaim institution.
出处
《云南大学学报(法学版)》
2007年第6期48-51,共4页
Jorunal of Yunan University Law Edition
关键词
反诉
概念
辨析
Counterclaim
Concept Analysis