期刊文献+

Predictive factors of tumor response to trans-catheter treatment in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma:A multivariate analysis of pre-treatment findings 被引量:1

Predictive factors of tumor response to trans-catheter treatment in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma:A multivariate analysis of pre-treatment findings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To elucidate the pre-treatment clinical and imaging findings affecting the tumor response to the transcatheter treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Two hundred cirrhotic patients with HCC received a total of 425 transcatheter treatments. The tumor response was evaluated by helical CT and a massive necrosis (MN) was def ined as a necrosis > 90%. Twenty-f ive clinical and imaging variables were analyzed: uninodular/multinodular HCC, unilobar/bilobar, tumor capsula, hypervascular lesion, portal vein thrombosis, portal hypertension, ascites, platelets count, aspartate transaminases/alanine transaminases (AST/ALT), alfa- fetoprotein (AFP) > 100, AFP > 400, serum creatinine, virus hepatitis C (VHC) cirrhosis, performance status, age, Okuda stage, Child-Pugg stage, sex, CLIP (Cancer of the Liver Italian Program) score, serum bilirubin, constitutional syndrome, serum albumine, prothrombin activity, BCLC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer) stage. Prognostic factors of response were subjected to univariate analysis and thereafter, when significant, to the multivariate analyses. RESULTS: On imaging analysis, complete response wasobtained in 60 (30%) patients, necrosis > 90% in 38 (19%) patients, necrosis > 50% in 44 (22%) patients, and necrosis < 50% in 58 (29%) patients. Ninety-eight (49%) of the 200 patients were considered to have a MN. In univariate analysis, significant variables (P < 0.01) were: uninodular tumor, unilobar, tumor size 2-6 cm, CLIP score < 2, absence of constitutional syndrome, and BCLC stage < 2. In a multivariate analysis, the variables reaching statistical signifi cance were: presence of tumor capsule (P < 0.0001), tumor size 2-6 cm (P < 0.03), CLIP score < 2 (P < 0.006), and absence of constitutional syndrome (P < 0.03). Kaplan-Mayer cumulative survival at 12 mo was 80% at 24 mo was 56%. MN was associated with a longer survival (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: MN after transcatheter treatment is more common in the presence of tumor capsule, maximum diameter of the main lesion between 2 and 6 cm, CLIP score < 2 and absence of constitutional syndrome. The ability to predict which patients will respond to transcatheter treatment may be useful in the clinical decision-making process, and in stratifying the randomization of patients in clinical trials. AIM: To elucidate the pre-treatment clinical and imaging findings affecting the tumor response to the transcatheter treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Two hundred cirrhotic patients with HCC received a total of 425 transcatheter treatments. The tumor response was evaluated by helical CT and a massive necrosis (MN) was defined as a necrosis 〉 90%. Twenty-five clinical and imaging variables were analyzed: uninodular/multinodular HCC, unilobar/bilobar, tumor capsula, hypervascular lesion, portal vein thrombosis, portal hypertension, ascites, platelets count, aspartate transaminases/alanine transaminases (AST/ALT), alfa- fetoprotein (AFP) 〉 100, AFP 〉 400, serum creatinine, virus hepatitis C (VHC) cirrhosis, performance status, age, Okuda stage, ChUd-Pugg stage, sex, CLIP (Cancer of the Liver Italian Program) score, serum bilirubin, constitutional syndrome, serum albumine, prothrombin activity, BCLC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer) stage. Prognostic factors of response were subjected to univariate analysis and thereafter, when significant, to the multivariate analyses. RESULTS: On imaging analysis, complete response wasobtained in 60 (30%) patients, necrosis 〉 90% in 38 (19%) patients, necrosis 〉 50% in 44 (22%) patients, and necrosis 〈 50% in 58 (29%) patients. Ninety-eight (49%) of the 200 patients were considered to have a MN. In univariate analysis, significant variables (P 〈 0.01) were: uninodular tumor, unilobar, tumor size 2-6 cm, CLIP score 〈 2, absence of constitutional syndrome, and BCLC stage 〈 2. In a multivariate analysis, the variables reaching statistical significance were: presence of tumor capsule (P 〈 0.0001), tumor size 2-6 cm (P 〈 0.03), CLIP score 〈 2 (P 〈 0.006), and absence of constitutional syndrome (P 〈 0.03). Kaplan-Mayer cumulative survival at 12 mo was 80% at 24 mo was 56%. MN was associated with a longer survival (P 〈 0.0001). CONCLUSION: MN after transcatheter treatment is more common in the presence of tumor capsule, maximum diameter of the main lesion between 2 and 6 cm, CLIP score 〈 2 and absence of constitutional syndrome. The ability to predict which patients will respond to transcatheter treatment may be useful in the clinical decision-making process, and in stratifying the randomization of patients in clinical trials.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2007年第45期6022-6026,共5页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 肝细胞癌 肝硬化 导管 疾病预防 Hepatocellular carcinoma Trans-catheterembolization/chemoembolization Tumor response
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Mike SL Liem,Ronnie TP Poon,Chung Mau Lo,Wai Kuen Tso,Sheung Tat Fan.Outcome of transarterial chemoembolization in patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma eligible for radiofrequency ablation[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2005,11(29):4465-4471. 被引量:15
  • 2Tohru Hashimoto M.D.,Hironobu Nakamura,Shinichi Hori,Kaname Tomoda,Katsuyuki Nakanishi,Takamichi Murakami,Takahiro Kozuka,Morito Monden,Mitsukazu Gotoh,Chikazumi Kuroda,Kenichi Wakasa,Masami Sakurai.Hepatocellular carcinoma: Efficacy of transcatheter oily chemoembolization in relation to macroscopic and microscopic patterns of tumor growth among 100 patients with partial hepatectomy[J].Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology.1995(2)
  • 3Hideo Uchida M.D.,Hajime Ohishi,Naoki Matsuo,Kiyoshi Nishimine,Shoichi Ohue,Yukihiro Nishimura,Munehiro Maeda,Tetsuya Yoshioka.Transcatheter hepatic segmental arterial embolization using lipiodol mixed with an anticancer drug and gelfoam particles for hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology.1990(3)
  • 4Bruix J,Sherman M,Llovet JM,Beaugrand M,Lencioni R,Burroughs AK,Christensen E,Pagliaro L,Colombo M,Rodes J.Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver[].J Hepatol.2001
  • 5.WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment[].World Health Organization Offset Publication No.1979
  • 6Miraglia R,Pietrosi G,Maruzzelli L,Petridis I,Caruso S,Marrone G,Mamone G,Vizzini G,Luca A,Gridelli B.Effi cacy of transcatheter embolization/chemoembolization (TAE/ TACE) for the treatment of single hepatocellular carcinoma[].World J Gastroenterol.2007
  • 7Biselli M,Andreone P,Gramenzi A,Trevisani F,Cursaro C,Rossi C,Ricca Rosellini S,Camma C,Lorenzini S,Stefanini GF,Gasbarrini G,Bernardi M.Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-controlled study[].Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.2005
  • 8Kawai S,Tani M,Okamura J,Ogawa M,Ohashi Y,Monden M,Hayashi S,Inoue J,Kawarada Y,Kusano M,Kubo Y,Kuroda C,Sakata Y,Shimamura Y,Jinno K,Takahashi A,Takayasu K,Tamura K,Nagasue N,Nakanishi Y,Makino M,Masuzawa M,Yumoto Y,Mori T,Oda T.Prospective and randomized trial of lipiodol-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison of epirubicin and doxorubicin (second cooperative study). The Cooperative Study Group for Liver Cancer Treatment[].Semin Oncol.1997
  • 9Llovet JM,Burroughs A,Bruix J.Hepatocellular carcinoma[].The Lancet.2003
  • 10Chung-BaoHsieh,Hao-MingChang,Teng-WeiChen,Chung-JuengChen,De-ChuanChan,Jyh-CherngYu,Yao-ChiLiu,Tzu-MingChang,Kuo-LiangShen.Comparison of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization,laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation,and conservative treatment for decompensated cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2004,10(4):505-508. 被引量:18

二级参考文献42

  • 1Okuda K, Ohtsuki T, Obata H, Tomimatsu M, Okazaki N,Hasegawa H, Nakajima Y, Ohnishi K. Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment.Study of 850 patients. Cancer 1985; 56:918-928.
  • 2Akriviadis EA, Llovet JM, Efremidis SC, Shouval D, Canelo R, Ringe B, Meyers WC. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 1998; 85:1319-1331.
  • 3Poon RT, Ngan H, Lo CM, Liu CL, Fan ST, Wong J. Transarterial chemoembolization for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma and postresection intrahepatic recurrence. J Surg Oncol 2000;73:109-114.
  • 4Poon RT, Fan ST, Tsang FH, Wong J. Locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: a critical review from the surgeon's perspective. Ann Sur~, 2002; 235:466-486.
  • 5Kasugai H, Kojima J, Tatsuta M, Okuda S, Sasaki Y, Imaoka S, Fujita M, Ishiguro S. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma by transcatheter arterial embolization combined with intra-arterial infusion of a mixture of cisplatin and ethiodized oil. Gastroenterology 1989; 97:965-971.
  • 6Carr BI. Hepatic artery chemoembolization for advanced stage HCC: experience of 650 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 2002;49:79-86.
  • 7Miller DL, Lotze MT. A plea for a standard standard. Radiology, 1993; 188:19-20.
  • 8Trevisani F, De Notariis S, Rossi C, Bemardi M. Randomized controlled trials on chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: is there room for new studies? J Clin Gastroenterol 2001; 32:383-389.
  • 9Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG, Morrow M, eds. AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th ed.Springer-Verlag; 2002.
  • 10Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1989.

共引文献31

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部