期刊文献+

调强放疗计划系统的剂量学特性测试方法 被引量:7

Dosimetric commissioning for treatment planning system of intensity modulated radiation therapy module
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的建立治疗计划系统调强放疗(IMRT)功能的剂量学特性测试方法,以期确定系统计算IMRT照射野或计划的剂量准确性。方法多叶准直器(MLC)调强是IMRT的主要实现方式,针对MLC特点设计一组测试例,测试这些特点对IMRT射野剂量分布的影响。与传统铅门相比, MLC设计的特点和带来的影响包括:(1)MLC叶片末端可能采用弧形端面设计,引起叶片末端效应; (2)MLC叶片侧面采用凸凹槽咬合设计,引起凸凹槽效应;(3)MLC叶片厚度通常比铅门簿,因此对原射线的衰减有差别;(4)IMRT照射野多个子野叠加照射形成的剂量分布将体现前述三个特点的综合效果。结果所有测试例的绝对剂量误差都较小,只有1个>2%。除了T1b和在10 cm深度时的T2外,其他测试例在3%/3 mm时的通过率都>95%。T1b和在10 cm深度时的T2位置处的计算剂量都偏高。除了对MLC凸凹槽的模拟稍差之外,经调整后的机器模型可计算得到相对准确的剂量分布,模型的各个参数基本已是最优值。结论实验结果显示该方法可准确反映MLC的设计特点对剂量的独立影响和综合影响,设计的测试方法适合于计划系统IMRT功能的验收测试。 Objective To develop a set of methods for testing dosimetric characteristics of treatment planning system with intensity modulated radiation therapy(IMRT) module. Methods Muhileaf collimator (MLC) based IMRT is the predominant technique being used presently. According to the designing characteristics of MLC, its influence includs : ( 1 ) Curved designing may be adopted for the MLC face, which can lead to complicated scattering effect; (2)The side of MLC usually have "tongue-and-groove" feature which can change the dose distribution near the side; (3) Compared to the thicker jaw, MLC usually have smaller attenuation effect for primary photon; (4) The IMRT field composed of several segments will exhibit the composite effects of the former three characteristics. Results The absolute dose error of the normalization point was relatively low and only one case had dose error 〉 2%. The pass rate at 3% / 3 mm was above 95%, except for cases Tlb and T2 at depth of 10 cm with the calculated dose being higher than the measured dose. Except for the relatively poor performance in the simulation of the MLC tongue and groove effect, the adjusted machine model, with the optimized model parameters having been achieved, could be used to calculate field dose accurately. Conclusions The methods developed here can reveal the independent and composite dosimetric effects of MLC. These methods can be used in the commissioning test for treatment planning system of the IMRT module.
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第6期455-460,共6页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
关键词 调强放疗 计划系统测试 质量保证 Intensity modulated radiotherapy Treatment planning system testing Quality assurance
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1AAPM . AAPM Report NO. 55 : radiation treatment dosimetry verification. Maryland:Published by the American Institute of Physics, 1995.
  • 2IAEA . IAEA Technical Reports Series No. 430 : commissioning and quality assurance of computerized planning system for radiation treatment of cancer. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency,2004.
  • 3戴建荣,胡逸民.治疗计划系统外照射光子束算法验证[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,1998,7(3):170-174. 被引量:3
  • 4Maria N, Graves, Antoinette V, et al. Calibration and quality assurance for rounded leaf-end MLC systems. Med Phys,2001,28 :2227- 2233.
  • 5Killoran J, Giraud J, Chin L. A dosimetric comparison of two multileaf collimator designs. Med Phys,2002,29:1752-1758.
  • 6Saiful M, Indra J, Todd S, et al. A dosimetnc comparison of various multileaf collimators. Phys Meal Biol,2002,47 : 159-170.
  • 7Cedric X. Design considerations for the sides of multileaf collimator Leaves. Phys Med Biol, 1998,43 : 1335-1342.
  • 8Low DA, Harms WB, Mutic S, et al. A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Med Phys, 1998,25 : 656 -661.
  • 9AAPM. AAPM Task Group 53 : quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. MedPhys, 1998,25 : 1773-1829.
  • 10Cadman P, Bassalow R, Sidhu NPS, et al. Dosimetric considerations for validation of a sequential IMRT process with a commercial treatment planning system. Phys Med Biol,2002,47:3001-3010.

二级参考文献7

  • 1American Association of Physicists in Medicine.Radiation treatment planning dosimetry verification.AAPM Report 55,1995.
  • 2Brame A,Lind BK,Kallman P,et al.Accuracy requirements and quality assurance of external beam therapy with photons and electrons.Acta Oncol,1988,Supp.
  • 3International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements.Use of computers in external radiotherapy procedures for high energy photons and electrons.ICRU Report,42,1987.
  • 4McCullough EC,Krueger AM,Performance evaluation of computerized treatment planning systems for radiotherapy.external photon beams.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1980,6:1599-1605.
  • 5Van Dyk.J Barenett RB,et al.Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1993,26:261-273.
  • 6Wang JW.Purdy JA.On methods of inhomogeneity corrections for photon transport.Med Phys,1990,17:807-814.
  • 7Kappas C,Rosenwald JC,Quality control of inhomogeneity correction algorithms used in treatment planning systems.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1995,32:847-858.

共引文献2

同被引文献34

  • 1黄晓延,黄劭敏,张黎,邓小武,钟宁山,陈立新.三维治疗计划系统的剂量学验证[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(6):496-500. 被引量:26
  • 2Zygmanski P, Rosca F, Kadam D, et al. Determination of depth and field size dependence of muhileaf collimator transmission in intensity-modulated radiation therapy beams. J Appl Clin Med Phys ,2007,8:2693.
  • 3Lorenz F, Nalichowski A, Rosca F, et al. Spatial dependence of MLC transmission in IMRT delivery. Phys Med Biol, 2007,52: 5985 -5999.
  • 4LoSasso T, Chui CS, Ling C. Physical and dosimetric aspects of a multileaf collimation system used in the dynamic mode for implementing intensity modulated radiotherapy. Med Phys,1998, 25 : 1919-1927.
  • 5Varian medical system. Eclipse 10 inverse planning administration and physics, Rev. 6. 1. 1. Palo Alto: Varian medical system, 2010:6044507.
  • 6Wasb E, Valen H. Dosimetric discrepancies caused by differing MLC parameters for dynamic IMRT. Phys Med Biol,2008,53: 405-415.
  • 7Webster GJ, Rowbottom CG, Mackay RI. Development of an optimum photon beam model for head and-neck intensity- modulated radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys,2007 ,8 :2711.
  • 8Losasso T. IMRT delivery performance with a varian muhileaf collimator. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2008,71 Suppl 1:85-88.
  • 9Low DA,Harms WB,Mutic S,et al.A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions[J].Med Phys,1998,25 (5):656-661.
  • 10Depuydt T,Van Esch A,Huyskens DP.A quantitative evaluation of IMRT dose distributions:refinement and clinical assessment of the gamma evaluation[J].Radiother Oncol,2002,62 (3):309-319.

引证文献7

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部