期刊文献+

Concentration variations of several ions in stream after a wildfire

火后溪流中几种离子浓度变化研究(英文)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In May 2006, a high intensity wildfire occurred in Songling forest region in Daxing'an Mountains, China. The concentration changes of eight ions (K^+, Na^+, Ca^2+, Mg^2+, Cl^-, Br^-, NO3^- and SO4^2-) were measured in burned and tmbumed streams after fire from May to Oct., 2006. Results show that the most ions flux were higher in burned stream than that in unburned stream during the sampling period, and the greatest concentrations of most ions transported from burned stream occurred in July. After fire, the most amplitude chemical ion was Ca^2+, whose average concentration was 5.50 mg·L^-1 higher than that in unburned stream, and the total concentration of every chemical ion presents a trend Ca^2+〉SO4^2- 〉Na^+〉Mg^2+〉NO3^- . The average concentrations of Ca^2+, SO4^2- , Na^+'Mg^2+,NO3^- showed an increase trend, but those of K^+, Cl^- , Br had a decreased trend. SO4^2- had the largest loss among these anions, followed by NO3^-. Overall, the increase degree of cation was greater than that of anion after burning. 2006年5月在黑龙江省大兴安岭松岭地区发生高强度火灾。在松岭地区选择受火烧影响和未受火烧影响的溪流作为研究对象,从2006年5月到10月进行水样采集,检测八种离子(K+、Na+、Ca2+、Mg2+、Cl-、Br-、NO3-和SO42-)浓度的变化。结果表明:在取样期间,火烧溪流输出的多数离子浓度高于未火烧的溪流,而且大多数离子的最高浓度出现在7月。火烧后,增加幅度最大的离子是Ca2+。其平均浓度高出未火烧溪流5.50 mg/L,各离子平均浓度增加从大到小为 Ca2+>SO42->Na+>Mg2+>NO3-。K+、Cl-、Br-平均浓度减小。火烧后,阴离子中,损失最多是SO42-,其次是NO3-。总体上看,火后阳离子增加的趋势大于阴离子。
作者 刘洋 胡海清
机构地区 东北林业大学
出处 《Journal of Forestry Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2007年第4期319-321,共3页 林业研究(英文版)
基金 This research was supported by National Coopera-tion Project of Japan and China.
关键词 Forest fire STREAM Water quality NUTRIENTS Fire effect 森林防火 河流 水质量 养分 射击效果
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Battle, J., Golladay, S. W. 2003. Prescribed fires impact on water quality of depressional wetlands in southwestern Georgia. Am. Midl. Nat., 150: 15-25.
  • 2Carignan,R., D'Arcy, P. and Lamontagne, S. 2000. Comparative impacts of fire and forest harvesting on water quality in Boreal Shield lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 57(Suppl. 2): 105-117.
  • 3Clayton, J. L. 1976. Nutrient gains to adjacent ecosystems during a forest fire - an evaluation. Forest Sci., 22: 162-166.
  • 4Engstrom, R. T., L. K. Kirkman and R. J. Mitchell. 2001. The natural history of the fire forest, p. 5-17. In: J. R. Wilson (ed.), The fire forest: longleaf pine-wiregrass ecosystem. Georgia Wildlife Federation, Vol. 8, No. 2.
  • 5Frost, C.C. 1995. Presettlement fire regimes in southeastern marshes, peatlands, and swamps, p.39-60. In: S. 1. Cerulean and R.T. Engstrom (eds.), Fire in wetlands: a management perspective. Proceedings of the Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference, No. 19. Tallahassee, Florida: Tall Timbers Research Station.
  • 6Gerla, P.J. Galloway, J.M. 1988. Water quality of two streams near Yellow stone Park, Wyoming, following the 1988 Clover-Mist wildfire. Environmental Geology, 36:127-136.
  • 7Grier, C.C. 1975. Wildfire effects on nutrient distribution and leaching in a coniferous ecosystem. Can. J. For. Res., 5: 599-607.
  • 8Luo Ruying. 2002. Soil Science. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House (in Chinese).
  • 9Maimer, A. 2004. Stream water quality as affected by wildfires in natural and manmade vegetation in Malaysian Borneo. Hydrol. Process, 18: 853-864.
  • 10Ma Xuehua. 1993. Forest Hydrology. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House (in Chinese).

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部