期刊文献+

公司监督与现金股利代理理论实证研究 被引量:8

Empirical Research on Corporate Monitors and Agency Theory of Cash Dividends
下载PDF
导出
摘要 用第一大股东持股比例、外部大股东持股比例和董事会中独立董事比例作为公司监督效果的代理变量,本文提供了一个现金股利能够减小代理成本的新证据。在控制了股利变动率、未预期净资产收益率、公司财务杠杆、公司规模以及经营业绩等因数的影响后,本文发现,市场对增加现金股利公告的反应与第一大股东持股比例正相关,与公司监督质量负相关。本文的结果暗示,在公司监督无效时,分派现金股利是一个降低代理成本的必要替代选择。 Using the percentage of shares held by the largest stockholder, the percentage of shares held by outside stock-holders and the proportion of outside directors in Board of Directors as agency variables for the effect of corporate monitors, this paper reports a new evidence on the hypothesis that dividends reduce agency costs. After the multivariate controls over the influences of factors including the change rate in dividend yield, unexpected ROE, leverage of corporate finance, firm size and operat-ing performance, this paper finds that the market reaction to the event of dividend increase announcment is positive related to the percentage of shares held by the largest stockholder, and negative related to the effect of corporate monitors. The conclusion of this paper implicates that cash dividend distribution can be a necessary alternative to substitute for ineffective corporate monitors in the interest of mitigating agency costs.
出处 《北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第6期27-31,共5页 JOURNAL OF BEIJING TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS UNIVERSITY:SOCIAL SCIENCES
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70671058)
关键词 事件研究法 现金股利 代理成本 公司治理 event-study methodology cash dividend agency costs corporate governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Jensen, M.C., and W. Meckling. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and capital structure [J]. Journal of Financial Economies, 1976, (3).
  • 2Lang,L.H. and R.Litzenberger. Dividend announcements: Cash flow signaling vs. free cash flow hypothesis [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1989, (24).
  • 3廖理,方芳.股利政策代理理论的实证检验[J].南开管理评论,2005,8(5):55-62. 被引量:31

二级参考文献24

  • 1Miller,Merton,Franco Modigliani.Dividend Policy,Growth and the Valuation of Shares.Journal of Business,1961,(34):411-433.
  • 2Jensen,Michael C.Willian H.Mecking.Theory of the Firm:Managerial Behavior.Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, (3): 305-360.
  • 3Grossman, Sanford J., Oliver D. Hart. Corporate Financial Structure and Managerial Incentives, in J. McCall, ed., The Economics of Information and Uncertainty, Chicago: University Press, 1982.
  • 4Easterbrook, Frank H.. Two Agency-Cost Explanations of Dividends. American Economic Review, 1954, (74): 650-659.
  • 5Jensen, Michael C.. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. American Economic Review, 1956, (76):323-329.
  • 6Lang, Larry H. P., Robert H. Litzenberger. Dividend Announcements:Cash Flow Signaling vs. Free Cash Flow Hypothesis. Journal of Financial Economics, 1989, (24): 1-33.
  • 7Yoon, Pyung S., Laura Starks. Signaling, Investment Opportunities,and Dividend Announcement, Review of Financial Studies, 1995.
  • 8陈伟 刘星 杨源新.中国股票市场股利政策信息传递效应的实证研究[A]..中国资本市场前沿理论研究文集[C].,1999.353-367.
  • 9Opler, T., Titman, S.. The Determinants of Leveraged Buyout Activity: Free Cash Flow vs. Financial Distress Costs. Journal of Finance, 1993, (48): 1985-1999.
  • 10French, K. R., Poterba, J. M.. Were Japanese Stock Prices Too High? Journal of Financial Economics, 1991, (29): 337-363.

同被引文献101

引证文献8

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部