期刊文献+

育龄妇女宫颈上皮内瘤变LEEP术患者生活质量的调查

Investigation of Quality of Life in Fertile Women with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】研究育龄妇女宫颈上皮内瘤变LEEP术患者的生活质量。【方法】选择2006年9月至2007年2月在本院宫颈癌早诊早治中心就诊的136例患者,诊断为CINⅡ/Ⅲ72例,行LEEP术者为观察组64例为对照组。采用WHOQOL-100量表对患者生活质量进行评分并分析。【结果】观察组生活质量显著差于对照组(P<0.01);观察组在生理领域、心理领域、社会关系领域明显差于对照组(P均<0.01)。两组在独立性领域、环境领域、宗教领域等差异无显著性(P均>0.05)。【结论】育龄妇女宫颈上皮内瘤病变LEEP术患者生活质量明显下降,在治疗疾病的同时应采取系统、正规的心理干预,以改善患者的生活质量。 【Objective】To investigate the quality of life in fertile women with Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN) after loop electrosurgical excision procedure(LEEP).【Methods】One hundred thirty six cases of outpatients were screened in the Centre of Early Diagnosis and Early Treatment for Cervical Carcinoma from Sep 2006 to Feb 2007 and divided randomly into two groups,72 cases of CINⅡ~Ⅲ were treated by LEEP as test group,64 cases were cervical chronic inflammation as control group.The quality of life among the two groups was investigated by WHOQOL-100.【Results】The quality of life in the test group was significantly worse than that in the control group in these fields including physiology,psychics,sociality(P〈0.01).The quality of life in two groups had no difference in independence,surroundings(P〉0.05).【Conclusion】 The quality of life of the patients with CIN after LEEP gets worse.so that psychological counseling can be of importance to improve their quality of life effectively.
出处 《医学临床研究》 CAS 2007年第6期893-894,共2页 Journal of Clinical Research
基金 深圳市科技局科研项目(项目编号200603102)
关键词 宫颈上皮内瘤样病变/外科学 生活质量 cervical intraepithelial neoplasms/SU quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献34

  • 1孙晓光,孙建衡.妇科肿瘤患者生活质量的评定及其干预[J].中华妇产科杂志,1996,31(6):378-380. 被引量:18
  • 2[1]Naughton MJ , Mcbee WL . Health- related quality of life after hysterectomy.Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology,1997, 40: 947-957.
  • 3[2]Rock JA. Quality of life assessment in gynecologic surgery. J Reprod Med, 2001, 46(5 Suppl): 515-519.
  • 4[3]Byles JE, Mishra G, Schofield M. Factors associated with hysterectomy among women in Australia. Health-Place, 2000, 6: 301-308.
  • 5[4]Sculpher MJ, Dwyer N, Byford S, et al.Randomized trial comparing hysterectomy and transcervical endometrial resection:Effect on health-related quality of life and costs two years after surgery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1996,103:142-149.
  • 6[5]Coulter A, Peto V, Jenkinson C. Quality of life and patient satisfaction following treatment for menorrhagia. Fam Pract, 1994, 1:394-401.
  • 7[6]Clarke A, Black N, Rowe P, et al. Indications for and outcome of total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: A prospective cohort study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1995, 102: 611-620.
  • 8[7]Skevington SM, Carse MS, Williams AC. Validation of the WHO-QOL-100: pain management improves quality of life for chronic pain patients. Clin J Pain, 2001,17:264-275.
  • 9[9]Richter DL, Mckeown RE, Corwin SJ, et al. The role of male partners in women's decision making regarding hysterectomy. J Womens Health Gend Based Med, 2000, 9(Suppl 2):S51-61.
  • 10[10]Helstrom L, Sorbom D, Backstrom T. Influence of partner relationship on sexuality after subtotal hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 1995, 74: 142-146.

共引文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部