3Lamme EN, Van Leeuwen RT, Brandsma K, et al. Higher numbers of autologous fibroblasts in an artificial dermal substitute improve tissue regeneration and modulate scar tissue formation[J]. Pathol, 2000, 190: 595-603.
4中华人民共和国卫生部,医疗机构消毒技术规范[Z],2012-04-05.
5J.B.Wright, D.L.Hansen and R.E.Burrell. The Comparative efficacy of twoantimicrobial barrier dressings: in vitro examination of two con- trolled release of silver dressings[J]. Wounds, 1998, 10(6): 179-188.
6Cervantes C, Siver S. Metal resistantce in Pseudomonas: genes and mechanisms. In: Nakazawa T, Furukawa K,Haas D, Siver S,editors, Moleanlar Biology of Pseudomonas[M]. Washington: American Soci- ety for Microbiology,1996.
7Yin HQ, Langford R, Burrell RE. Comparative evaluation of the an- timicrobial activity of ActicoatTM antimicrobial barrier dressing[J]. J Bum Care and Rehab,1999,20:195-200.
8Sladkova M, Vlckova B, Pavel I, et al. Surface-enhanced Raman scat- tering from a single molecularly bridged silver nanopartiele aggregate [J]. Journal of Molecular Structure, 2009,924-926:567-570.
9Atiyeh BS, Costagliola M, Hayek SN, et al. Effect of silver on bum wound infection control and healing: Review of the literature [J]. Burns, 2007,33(2): 139-148.
10Esteban-Tejeda L, Malpartida F, Esteban-Cubillo A, et al. The antibac- terial and antifimgal activity of a soda-lime glass containing silver nanoparticles[J]. Nanotechnology, 2009,20(8):85-103.
