期刊文献+

注册会计师审计报告虚假陈述民事责任的免责研究 被引量:4

Research on the Exemption from Civil Liability Caused by False Statement in Auditor's Report
下载PDF
导出
摘要 注册会计师审计报告虚假陈述民事责任的免责,是注册会计师民事责任的核心问题之一。本文以《1.9规定》、《6.11规定》等司法解释及相关的法律法规为依据,充分利用《1.9规定》、《6.11规定》中的免责及共同侵权事由,对会计师事务所及注册会计师在虚假陈述民事案件中应负的责任作出合乎法理的解释和界定,把民事赔偿限定在合理的范围内,有利于维护会计师事务所及注册会计师的正当合法权益。 The exemption from civil liability caused by false statement in auditor's report is one of the cores in CPA civil liabilities. Based on 1.9 rules, 6.11 rules, and other judicial interpretations and relevant laws or regulations, this paper takes full advantages of the exemption from liabilities and the matter of joint tort in 1.9 rules and 6. II rules in order to make accepted - by- law explanations and definitions of responsibilities which the CPA firms and auditors should take in civil case resulted from false statement in auditor's report. It confines civil compensations to reasonable fields so that it better defends the right legitimate rights and interests of CPA firms and auditors.
作者 蒋尧明
出处 《财经理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第6期53-58,共6页 The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(05BJY017)
关键词 注册会计师 审计报告 虚假陈述 民事责任 免责 CPA Auditor's Report False Statement Civil Liabilities Exemption from Liabil- ities
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1《正确界定会计师事务所的民事责任》,中注协网站http ://www.cicpa.org. cn/, 2007 - 07 - 25
  • 2In re LTV Securities Litigation, 88F, R. D. 134(ND Tex. 1980).
  • 3焦津洪.“欺诈市场理论”研究[J].中国法学,2003(2):110-114. 被引量:51
  • 4张明远.美国的证券民事诉讼制度.证券法律评论,2002,(10):402-402.
  • 5克里斯蒂安·冯·巴尔著.张新宝,焦美华译.欧洲比较侵权行为法[M].北京:法律出版社,2001.

二级参考文献15

  • 1In re LTV Securities Litigation, 88 F. R. D.134 (ND Tex. 1980).
  • 2Daniel Fischel, Use of Modern Finance Theory in Securities Fraud Cases Involving Actively Traded Securities, 38 Bus. Law. l, (1982).
  • 3485 U.S. 224 (1988).
  • 4Langevoort, Taming the Animal Spirits of the Stock Markets: A Behavioral Approach to Securities Regulation, Nw. U.L. Rev., forthcoming 2002.
  • 5Stout, Are Stock Markets Costly Casinos? Disagreement, Market Failure and Securities Regulation, 81 Va. L. Rev.611 (1995).
  • 6Macey & Miller, Good Finance, Bad Economics: An Analysis of the Fraud on the Market Theory, 42 Stan.L.Rev. 1059(1990).
  • 7Prosser, Handbook of the law of Tortss, 4th ed. ,pp.85-686.
  • 8Sup't of Insurance v. Banker's Life & Casualty Co. , 404 U.S. 6,13 (1971).
  • 9Affiliated Ute Citizens v. U.S., 406 U.S. 128 (1972).
  • 10524 F. 2d891 (9th Cir.) (1975).

同被引文献88

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部