期刊文献+

核素骨显像与MRI对肿瘤骨转移诊断的对比研究 被引量:2

A comparative study of bone scintigraphy and MRI in diagnosing bone metastases.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨核素平面骨显像(SPECT)与磁共振成像(MRI)对于诊断肿瘤骨转移的临床价值。方法回顾性分析42例肿瘤患者接受骨显像和磁共振检查的结果。结果42例患者,骨显像阳性35例(83.3%),MRI扫描阳性30例(71.4%),两者比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.70,P>0.10)。骨显像阳性病灶数68个,MRI检出病灶数59个,两者比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.10)。骨显像和MRI共检出病灶数127个中,脊柱病灶最多。结论核素平面骨显像仍为筛选肿瘤患者骨转移的首选检查,MRI是其必要的补充手段。 Objective the comparative study value about bone scintigraphy and MRI in evaluating bone metastases, Methods, By restrospectively summarizing 42 patients with malignant tumor received bone scintigraphy and MPd. Results The positive rates of scintigraphy and MRI were 83.3% (35/42) and 71.4% (30/42) ( P 〉 0.10) .68 lesions were found by bone scintigraphy and 59 lesions were detected by MRI ( P 〉 0. 10 ). Conclusion Compared to MRI, bone scintigraphy may be recommended as the first choice of imaging examination for diagnosis of malignant tumor.
出处 《四川医学》 CAS 2007年第11期1218-1219,共2页 Sichuan Medical Journal
关键词 核素平面骨显像 磁共振 骨转移瘤 bone scintigraphy magnetic resonance imaging metastatic bone tumor
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1曹来宾,王安明,徐爱德,何树岗,田维泽,江志勇,许祖闪,吴树森,王天保,陈宝仓,高士伟,王学庆,田军,孟凡录,李先启,庄悦新,秦东京,殷焕起,唐志学,臧宝江,唐桂长,崔华兴,徐万峰,李会祥,王国华,周海舟,周韶龙,衣建安.1047例骨转移瘤的影像学诊断[J].中华放射学杂志,1997,31(8):547-551. 被引量:103
  • 2Taoka T, Mayr NA,Lee HJ, et al. Factors influencing visualization of vertebral metastases on MR imaging versus bone scintigraphy[ J]. A JR,2001, 176(6) : 1525 - 1530
  • 3肖亚景,苏敏.核素骨显像与MRI对脊柱骨转移癌的检出比较[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,1999,9(4):198-200. 被引量:8
  • 4Eustace S,Tello R, Decarvalho V, etal. A comparison of wholebody turbo- STIR MR imaging and planar 99^Tc^m-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy in the examination of patients with suspected skeletal metastases[J]. AIR, 1997,169(6) : 1655 - 1661.
  • 5Frank JA, Ling A, Patronas N J, et al. Detection of rnalignantbone tumors: MR imaging versus scintigraphy[ J]. MR, 1990:155 - 1043.
  • 6陈兆秋,李万湖,胡旭东,赵书英.MRI与核素骨显像对脊柱转移瘤诊断价值的对比观察[J].肿瘤防治杂志,2000,7(5):500-502. 被引量:8
  • 7张雪梅,夏黎明,王仁法,王承缘,吴华.核素骨显像与MRI检测脊柱转移瘤的对比研究[J].放射学实践,2002,17(5):428-430. 被引量:16
  • 8Yuh WT, Quets JP, Lee HJ, et al. Anatomic distribution of metastases in the verbebral body and modes of hematogenous spread[ J]. Spine, 1996,21 (19) :2243 - 2250.

二级参考文献14

  • 1张雪哲,王德生,田宗皎,王廷昱.脊柱转移瘤的CT诊断(附41例分析)[J].中华放射学杂志,1994,28(3):167-170. 被引量:47
  • 2曹来宾,实用放射学杂志,1993年,9卷,257页
  • 3Gosfield E,Alavi A,Kkneeland B.Comparison of radionuclide bone scans and magnetic resonance imaging[J].J Nucl Med,1993,34(12):2191-2198.
  • 4Aitchison FA,Poon FW,Hadley MD,et al.Vertebral metastases and an equivocal boe scan: value of magnetic resonance imaging[J].Nucl Med Commun,1992,13(2):429-431.
  • 5Algra PR,Bloem JL,Tissing H,et al.Detection of vertebral metastases:comparison between Mrimaging and bone scintigraphy[J].Radiographics,1991,11(2):219-32.
  • 6Khurana JS,Rosenthal DI,Rosenberg AE,et al.Skeletal metastases in libosarcoma detectable only by magnetic resonance imaging[J].Clin Orthop,1989,243(2):204-207.
  • 7Shigeru,Kosuda,Tatsaaki,et al.Does bone SPECT actually have lower sensitivity for detecting vertebral metastasis than MRI [J].J Nucl Med,1996, 37(3):975.
  • 8Gates GF. SPECT bone scanning of the spine[J]. Semin Nucl Med 1998,28 (1):78-94.
  • 9Krasnow AZ, hellman RS,Timins ME,et al.Diagnoatic bone scanning in oncology[J].Semin Nucl Med,1997, 27(2): 107-141.
  • 10张宗军,江苏医药,1997年,23卷,92页

共引文献122

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部