期刊文献+

TAPs主观评分研究的回顾与前景

TAPs subjective scoring research: Review and potentials
下载PDF
导出
摘要 阐述了TAPs在主观评分领域的研究现状及成果,指出TAPs主观评分研究在实验操作层面上存在的漏洞和不足。操作层面的不足主要表现在忽视受试者数量和外部干扰因素可能对实验结果的影响,未能将TAPs数据分类以及缺乏较为详尽的TAPs编码说明和编码信度说明。就TAPs主观评分研究的进一步发展提出了建议。 TAPs has been widely used in subjective scoring research recently. By reviewing the development of TAPs subjective scoring research over the past ten years, its operational pitfalls and limitations were pointed out despite its marginal success in some areas. To be more specific, the operational pitfalls lie in its failure to take into account those factors such as the types of TAPs data, the number of subjects and the degree of external intervention that may exert influence on the results of the research. Also, another important problem is the lack of detailed illustration of coding scheme and reliability of codings. The future development of TAPs subjective scoring research is concluded by offering some suggestions.
作者 文慧 聂建中
出处 《鞍山科技大学学报》 2007年第5期556-560,共5页 Journal of Anshan University of Science and Technology
关键词 TAPs主观评分研究 研究成果 信度 前景 TAPs subjective scoring research research achievement reliability potentials
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1BACHMAN L F, LYNCH B K, MASON M. Investigating variability in tasks and rater judgements in a performance test of foreign language speaking[J]. Language Testing, 1995, (12) :238 - 257.
  • 2BROWN A. The effect of rater variables in the development of an occupation-specific language performance test[J]. Language Testing, 1995, (12) : 1 - 15.
  • 3CUMMING A. expertise in evaluating second language compositions[J ]. Language Testing, 1990, (7) :31 - 51.
  • 4CUMMING A, KANTOR R, POWERS D E. Decision-maklng while rating ESL/EFL writing tasks: a descriptive framework [J]. The Modem Language Journal ,2002, (86) :67 - 96.
  • 5LUMELY T. Assessment criteria in a large-scale writing test:what do they really mean to the raters? [J]. Language Testing,2002,19(3) :246 - 276.
  • 6MILANOVIC M, SSVILLE N, SHEN S H. A study of the decision-making behavior of composition markers[A]. MILANOVIC M, SAVILLE N. Perfomlance testing, cognition and assessment [ C]. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Local Examination Syndicate/Cambridge University Press, 1996: 92- 115.
  • 7ORR M. The FCE speaking test: using rater reports to help interpret test scores[J ]. System,2002, (30) : 143 - 154.
  • 8POLLITT A, MURRAY N. What raters really pay attention to[ A]. MILAHOVIC M, SAVILLE N. Performance testing, cognition, and assessment :selected papers from the 15th Langnage Testing Research Colloquium (LTRC), Cambridge and Amhem[C]. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Lcal Examinations Syndicate/Cambridge University Press, 1996: 74- 91.
  • 9WEIGLE S C. Effects of training on raters of ESL compositions[ J ]. Language Testing, 1994,11 (2) :197 - 223.
  • 10LEOW R P, KARA M S. To think aloud or not to think aloud[J ]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2004, (26):35 - 57.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部