论程序的实体化

Substantializing of Procedure

与实体中心说所导致的程序工具价值论相反,程序中心说导致了实质正义被贬低的弊端。将公正的程序置于中心地位,只是为了平衡对实体权利的不适当的强调,而不是要放逐实体。程序必须回应实体、向社会开放评价的实体标准。因为实体为程序规定目标、并为程序构筑边界。诚然,程序实体化会带来规范内容的价值冲突和造成对程序的统一性、独立性和完整性冲击的风险。由于现代社会的制度正义取决于整个市民社会的个体觉悟和道德交往,因此,程序实体化所造成的风险的化解途径,在于通过公民教育与民主实践培养发达的公民社会。

Contrary to the theory of tool value of procedure that the theory of substance centre caused, the theory of procedure centre take the drawback of the actual justice to be belittled. Putting the just procedure in the centre, position is to equilibrium the inappropriate em-phasizing to substantial right, but not should banish substance. The procedure must respond the substance; open the substantial standard of appraisal to the society, because substance stipulates the goal and constructs the border for the procedure. Substantializing of procedure will bring the value conflict of standardizing the content and cause to the risks to the unity, independence and integrality of the procedure. The system justice of the modem society depends on the individual awareness and morals of the whole citizen＇ s society, so, the routes of dissolving risks that substantializing of procedure caused lie in training developed citizen＇ s society through the citizen＇s education the democratic practice.