3Shrake K L. Comparison of major complieation rates associated with four methods of arterial closure[ J]. Am J Cardiol,2000, 85:1024 - 1025.
4Vaitkus PT. A meta-analysis of percutanous vascular closure devices after diagnostic catheterization and percutanous coronary intervention[J]. J Invasive Cardiol,2004,16:243 - 246.
5Nasu K, Tsuchikane E, Sumitsuji S,et al. The safety and efficacy of "preclosure" utilizing the closer suture-mediated vascular closure device for ach/evement of hemostasis in patients following coronary interventions: resuits of the second Perclose Accelerated AmbulatiOn and Discharge(PARADISE Ⅱ ) Trial[J]. J Invasive Cardiol,2005,17:30- 33.
5Doyle BJ,Godfrey MJ,Lennon BJ,et al.Initial experience with the Cardiva Boomerang vascular closure device in diagnostic catheterization[J].Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2007,69(2):203-208.
6Dangas G.Vascular Complication after percataneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual comperession versus azteriotomy closure devices[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2001,52(1):3-7.
